Hi
On Wed 10-Jul-2002 at 09:25:37AM +0100, Andy Powell wrote:
>
> As one of the original authors of the Qualified DC in HTML doc I'd
> be (just about) willing to put some effort into updating the
> document (assuming that the general concensus is that it is
> worthwhile). The thought of having the draft sit in DCMI process
> for another 2 years doesn't exactly thrill me - but I'm willing to
> try :-)
I think it would be worth it. I also think that the mistakes in the
other documents (s/dcterms:medium/dc:format/) should be corrected
ASAP.
I suspect that (most) people using the documents on the DC site are
generally unaware / not really bothered that they are 'draft
documents' they will just be after some examples of good practice
they can copy and build on -- that's why it's important to keep them
correct and upto date, (IMHO).
Chris
|