Elizabeth:
See the following paper from Collewijn's lab:
Lemij HG, Collewijn H.
Differences in accuracy of human saccades between stationary and jumping
targets.
Vision Res. 1989;29(12):1737-48.
In addition, you can check out papers on the range effect for
saccades, e.g.:
Kapoula Z, Robinson DA.
Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: saccades can be accurate.
Vision Res. 1986;26(5):735-43.
Kapoula Z.
Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system.
Vision Res. 1985;25(8):1155-7.
Harold
> ----------
> From: Elisabeth M. Fine
> Reply To: Eye-movement mailing list
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:02 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [EM_LIST] saccade accuracy
>
> I am looking for information on relative accuracy of saccades to
> different distances from fixation (e.g. 1 deg vs. 10 deg vs. 20 deg).
> Does anyone know where I might find that information?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> -Elisabeth Fine.
>
>
>
>
> ***** NOTE NEW FAX NUMBER *****
>
> Elisabeth M. Fine
>
> Schepens Eye Research Institute
> Harvard Medical School
> 20 Staniford Street
> Boston, MA 02114
>
> (617) 912-2528 (voice)
> (617) 912-0138 (fax)
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> --
> EYE-MOVEMENT mailing list ([log in to unmask])
> N.B. Replies are sent to the list, not the sender
> To unsubscribe, etc. see
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/eye-movement/introduction.html
> Other queries to list owner at [log in to unmask]
>
>
--
EYE-MOVEMENT mailing list ([log in to unmask])
N.B. Replies are sent to the list, not the sender
To unsubscribe, etc. see http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/eye-movement/introduction.html
Other queries to list owner at [log in to unmask]
|