JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DC-LIBRARIES-AP Archives


DC-LIBRARIES-AP Archives

DC-LIBRARIES-AP Archives


DC-LIBRARIES-AP@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DC-LIBRARIES-AP Home

DC-LIBRARIES-AP Home

DC-LIBRARIES-AP  April 2002

DC-LIBRARIES-AP April 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Proposal for Agent roles

From:

Rachel Heery <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Dublin Core Libraries Application Profile <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:17:29 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (55 lines)

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Rebecca S. Guenther wrote:

>
> The proposal for agent roles using the MARC relator terms/codes is
> available at:
> http://www.loc.gov/marc/dc/Agent-roles.html

I would support this proposal...

One comment I would like to make is that it appears to me that the
approach recommended here (to use terms from an existing element set
maintained by a third party with non-DCMI namespace) appears to differ
from that suggested by the DC Education application profile see [1] which
states:

<quote>
Interoperability with Other Metadata Schemas: [UBAP 5.2.11] [top]

In part, the notion of audience level can be expressed through the concept
of 'Context' in the IEEE LTSC LOM 'Educational Category'. While the
promise of an application profile that makes possible the integration of
elements from the LOM namespace with those of the DCMI through the use of
a publicly accessible, DCMI registered application profile, movement
toward such an interoperable solution has been painfully slow. Until it is
absolutely clear to the education community that such a solution is viable
in real-world applications, DCMI needs to move forward serving the
education community.
</quote>

I note that there has been exchanges between the DC Library AP WG with
Andy Powell who has suggested possible syntaxes to express the LC relator
terms in various syntaxes.

I would acknowledge that there seems a qualitative difference between
adopting a complete set of terms which form a discrete entity (MARC
Relator list) and plucking one term from an element set (IEEE LOM).

However there does seem to be some form of resolution required (perhaps in
form of guidance from Usage Board?)  between the position of DC
Education WG approach and that of DC Libraries WG.

Rachel

[1]http://www.dublincore.org/groups/education/Audience-Level-Proposal.shtml
DCMI Education Working Group:
Proposal for audienceLevel Qualifier for the Audience Element


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Heery
UKOLN
University of Bath                              tel: +44 (0)1225 826724
Bath, BA2 7AY, UK                               fax: +44 (0)1225 826838
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
October 2002
September 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager