The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  March 2002

DISABILITY-RESEARCH March 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Impact of WHO concepts?

From:

"m.miles" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

m.miles

Date:

Mon, 18 Mar 2002 23:36:18 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

Re: Impact of WHO concepts?  [or, Biopsychosocialism Rules OK?]

Er, um, yeah, thanks Shelley T.  I posted some comments titled  “ICF/ICIDH-
2 crit [rebalance]” on this list on 23 Nov. 2001, illustrated with the
Royal Navy classification of chamber pots, one of the world’s briefly
memorable literary occasions.   I’d like to oblige further after Philip
Scullion’s enquiry, but don’t actually make any practical use of ICF and so
ought not say too much on that aspect. Practical investigation is going
forward in many places. There is already a journal-published lit of about
2000 items on the field-testing leading up to ICF. It will grow.

The Dutch National Instt. of Public Health++  [RIVM]  has been keeping
track of the action with a newsletter and a downloadable bibliog., which
has been at www.rivm.nl/publichealth/whocc-icidh  --   I couldn’t get into
this site just now to check that this stuff is all still available. Might
be down or busy temporarily, or the URL may have changed.  I think RIVM is
likely to keep it up somehow or other, because there’s bound to be a
widening circle of people involved with ICF whether as users (active or
passive, i.e. classifiers or DPs whose biopsychosocial functioning is being
classified  -  “No, Madam, this won’t hurt at all”), theorists, critics,
whatever.

The ICF site is at:
http://www3.who.int/icf/icftemplate.cfm

The old ICIDH-2 site, where one could get into the draft version and see
what kind of animal it was, has gone – one is redirected now to the ICF
site, where the index can be glimpsed, but you can’t actually browse in it
(yet). They may eventually upload the whole thing – the site is under
development – but at present you have to buy it to browse seriously.
Probably many medical libraries will eventually have it  -  but only 5 out
of 23 COPAC libraries  (i.e. UK major research universities) have a copy at
present.

I don’t see it figuring heavily in the Get-Well Card stores  -  ICF is
about 300 pages in English. The Japanese version is perhaps more artistic.

Re  Philip’s question about the basic ICF concepts:  “…If this were adopted
enthusiastically, as the basis for the provision of health and social care
services in the UK, would we see substantial changes. Could we anticipate
improvements?”

One could argue  (and I guess Shelley T. may bring in some Foucaultian
perspective on this…)  that “what it’s called” can in the long run have
quite an effect on people’s thinking, and maybe another decade after that
some effect on the provision of services.  But such a cause-and-effect
would be extremely hard to differentiate amidst all the other static and
changing factors. In the shorter term, changes in the “provision of health
and social care services” will be heavily dependent on budgets, management
competence, flexibility, professional training, DP compliance or
stroppiness, etc, and a slew of concepts and motivations accumulating
during the past 40 years.  (I mean, amidst all that past slew, ICIDH
probably did have some effects during 40 years, for better or worse  -- but
I doubt that many people looking back would say it was a major factor in
their working life or their personal rehab process).

Enterprising DPOs here and there could try to steer the bandwagon, i.e.
taking the line that ICF has officially been launched, it’s going to be
used increasingly, it does accommodate some ‘social model’ or ‘social
construction’ aspects  (under the “biopsychosocial” terminology), there’s a
lot of confusions and ambiguities, so the strategy will be to get on board
and emphasize the more acceptable parts, get pro-actively into the training
game, produce the series of  “Medical Idiots Guide to ICF”,  “Social Work
Idiots Guide to ICF”, etc.

But none of that is likely, during the foreseeable (15-20 year?) future, to
have much effect on budgets, available personnel, DP’s control of
resources, design of housing and public space.  I mean, the ICF is a
classification, a glorified list. Sexy it is not. There will be very many
other, more immediate, political and social factors that are likely to
impact on service provision.

On a broader front, battle will continue on the question of
whether ‘universal concepts of disablement’ do actually exist (against 150
years of anthropological research), underpinning the ambition of
a ‘universal language of descriptive classification’ (against 100 years of
linguistic research); or whether this is merely another type of arrogant
(probably male) ‘scientific fundamentalism’ enabling the globocrats
 [or (g)lobotomised bureaucrats] to increase their ‘control’ over
the ‘bodies of the oppressed’ (etc), and maybe a few kama positions in
between.

breathlessly,
m99m

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager