On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> > http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0203&L=dc-architecture&F=&S=&P=9468
>
> Think we just gave up on the issue.
Read the text of the last couple of messages from Stu and Carl?
I'm not sure how we define concensus... but Stu said 'Andy has hit the
nail on the head', Carl agreed, no-one disagreed. Then we wait a few
weeks and people start saying it never happened :-) Oh well, such is life
I suppose :-(
> > 'Simple Dublin Core' already appears in the title of (at least) one draft
> > DCMI recommendation
> >
> > Expressing Simple Dublin Core in RDF/XML
> > http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/28/dcmes-xml/
> >
> > 'Simple Dublin Core' is defined in section 4.1 of
> >
> > Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML
> > http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dc-xml-guidelines/
> >
> > Both documents have been up for comment for a significant period :-(
>
> That's true, but they do not agree in their use of 'Simple' - as i understand.
In what way? They look consistent to me?
Both say, 15 elements from DCMES. Both say, no qualifiers. Both say, no
other elements. Both allow for encoding of the language of the element
value.
??
Andy
--
Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell +44 1225 383933
Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
|