Andy wrote
>
> ?? - didn't we just have a loonngggg discussion about this on
> dc-architecture ending with
>
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0203&L=dc-architecture&F=&S=&P=9468
>
> It seemed to me that we reached some concensus on the issue of what
> 'Simple Dublin Core' is in that discussion. Perhaps not?
Think we just gave up on the issue.
>
> 'Simple Dublin Core' already appears in the title of (at least) one draft
> DCMI recommendation
>
> Expressing Simple Dublin Core in RDF/XML
> http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/28/dcmes-xml/
>
> 'Simple Dublin Core' is defined in section 4.1 of
>
> Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dc-xml-guidelines/
>
> Both documents have been up for comment for a significant period :-(
That's true, but they do not agree in their use of 'Simple' - as i understand.
Cheers,
rs
>
> For what it is worth, I would like to see 'Simple Dublin Core' defined in
> a separate document - a DCMI glossary perhaps.
>
> Andy
> --
> Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell +44 1225 383933
> Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
>
|