On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Makx Dekkers wrote:
> I was wondering if there were any further comments on Rostislav's
> new draft. One point that I noted is that the date in the document
> has not changed from the previous version, and that it is not clear
> to me what changes were applied as a result of the discussion on the
> previous version. I would also think that the title should be
> something like "Representing Simple Dublin Core in X.500 and LDAP".
A comment not on substantive content but on 'vaocabulary labelling'..
I think we should avoid use of the expression 'Simple Dublin Core' as it
is not defined (as far as I can tell?). I would prefer 'Representing the
DCMES in X500 and LDAP'
I'll put this in a proposal on a separate thread... to keep this thread to
discussion of content
>
> Do people think it is a good idea if we move this forward towards
> an official DCMI document?
Yes.
Rachel
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Heery
UKOLN
University of Bath tel: +44 (0)1225 826724
Bath, BA2 7AY, UK fax: +44 (0)1225 826838
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/
|