> From [log in to unmask] Fri Mar 8 16:30 MET 2002
> content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
> Thread-Topic: Re: Public Comment on DC-simple XML Schema declaration
> within OAI
> Thread-Index: AcHGrDpz/EG80hNpQAmDGuSf4riG1QACWQMg
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:30:05 -0500
> From: Carl Lagoze <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Public Comment on DC-simple XML Schema declaration within OAI
> Comments: cc: Herbert Van de Sompel <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by scarlett.mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE id QAA20116
>
> Roland,
>
> Regarding point 1: The prohibition as you state it sound pretty draconian; seems like some of the people originally motivated OAI (eprints folks) would want mathML. Remind me again, is there a solution that allows things like mathML but forbid arbitrary other XML?
>
Sure, you could (!) do that. W3C's xml-schema-primer has an example, with content restricted to XHTML:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-schema-0 sec.5.5. It's the example preceding the textType example.
In particular table 4 in that section is quite useful as summary of built in facilities.
There's a similar technique with attributes.
One could try: http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML for a namespace URI.
There's some use of MathML embedded into XHTML -
(cf. processContents="skip" in the example cited above)
rs
> Carl
>
> I've copied to Herbert Van de Somple because the MathML thing might be of concern to him also.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roland Schwaenzl
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:19 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Public Comment on DC-simple XML Schema declaration within
> > OAI
> >
> >
> > Dears,
> >
> > with us it's now the time for reports rather than development.
> > I'll not be able to follow this discussion the coming week.
> >
> >
> > Let me try to summarize, what i understand currently from the dc-xml
> > discussion.
> >
> >
> > 1. In OAi the use of dc:elements with the xml- simple
> > dataType "string" will (continue to) be required in
> > the mandatory part of OAi.
> > It could be, that OAi allows a dataType extension by
> > the xml:lang attribute.
> >
> > [In particular no mark-up from W3C's MathML or Ruby will be allowed in
> > oai-dc records].
> >
> > 2. There are mixed views on (details of) requirements, design
> > and coding
> > for dcmi supported "plain-xml"-schemes.
> >
> >
> > Please correct me on mistaken points.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > rs
> >
>
|