John - Thanks for this. Andy Thomas was included in the original
circulation in mid Feb. The original asked what GIS was being used, on
which you may be able to help. Is the project design for the assessment
`substantially complete', which is the trigger point for the chart? I will
make the corrections. - Brian
> ----------
> From: John Preston[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To: SMRforum is for the circulation of information and general
> discussion
> Sent: 12 March 2002 17:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Urban Archaeological Databases national league table
>
> <<File: InterScan_SafeStamp.txt>>
> For info - the Cambridge UAD database is complete and running. I am the
> contact for Cambridge City Council; Andy Thomas and Tim Reynolds are the
> contacts for the County Council. The Cambridge Archaeological Unit has
> prepared a draft project design for the Assessment. John
>
> >>> DURHAM Brian <[log in to unmask]> 03/08 3:25 pm >>>
> Hi - The attached A4 table updates the one I prepared in 1996, using
> information from as many compilers/owners as I have been able to muster by
> telephone and e-mail. Roger Thomas has seen it twice this time round, and
> told me on Tuesday that it seemed OK.
>
> The update was done at the request of ALGAO urban subcommittee, because it
> is seen as a major plank of national policy on urban issues (no disrespect
> to the EUS programme, which has different challenges).
>
> Roger made a comment this time which articulates something I have been
> aware
> of, ie the contact column has a mixture of compilers, UAD officers and
> planning archaeologists. I could improve this by adding columns, but it
> would go off the page and lose impact. So just bear it in mind. Hope it
> is
> useful and instructive. - Brian
>
> <<UADprogram06.progress update 2002>>
> Brian Durham, Archaeologist
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Unless otherwise stated, this e-mail is confidential and intended
> solely for the individual to whom it is addressed. We apologise
> if it has been sent to you by mistake and would be grateful if you
> would contact the sender as soon as possible.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient please do not make use of
> the information in this e-mail, as it may be privileged and/or
> confidential. Any use of its contents by anyone other than the
> intended recipient may be a breach of civil or criminal law.
>
> We have taken reasonable precautions to minimise the risk of
> infection by viruses but we cannot accept liability for any
> damage which may occur as a result of any viruses. You
> should therefore carry out your own virus checks before
> opening any attachment.
>
> ********************************************************************
>
>
.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed.
If you received this email in error please notify the sender by return email or Oxford City Information Systems 01865-252111.
http://www.oxford.gov.uk
.
|