At 02:35 PM 2/13/2002 -0500, Wagner,Harry wrote:
> > Ah, thanks, now I understand what was meant by 3 separate systems. Is
> > there general interest in discussing other registry
> > prototypes to shape and
> > focus the functional requirement discussions?
>
>Absolutely - that is meant to be our primary focus for the next several
>months.
ok, than i offer http://www.w3.org/2001/10/navigate/ as a prototype for
helping shape such discussions. I have additional prototypes built using
Jena, but these look similar to what you're using as well.
>We have settled on the technology to use (IMO) but much of the functionality
>is still open for discussion. Your contributions would be greatly
>appreciated.
err... who is 'we'? This group? And with respect to technology, do you mean
something like "RDF as a means of recording the semantics, and Jena as a
toolkit for supporting the query, db interface and supporting API"? yes?
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead mailto:[log in to unmask]
w3c world wide web consortium tel:1.614.763.1100
|