|
|
> From [log in to unmask] Fri Feb 15 17:17 MET 2002
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> Importance: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:13:04 +0100
> From: Makx Dekkers <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: HTML Guidelines
> Comments: cc: "Diane I. Hillmann" <[log in to unmask]>,
> Beth Marsh <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> I was just looking at our HTML guidelines and saw that they say:
>
> <link rel = "schema.DC
> href = "http://purl.org/DC/elements/1.0/">
>
> (in: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt) and
>
> <link
> rel="schema.DC"
> href="http://dublincore.org/qdcmes/1.0/"
> title="DCMES plus DCMI recommended qualifiers">
>
> (in: http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/08/15/dcq-html/)
>
> A couple of days ago we got a DCMI-Feedback question where
> http://dublincore.org/qdcmes/1.0/ had gone and we were wondering
> why someone remembered that link. Turns out they were just reading
> our documentation.
>
> Both these guidelines are linked from the Usage Guide. The Usage
> Guide also mentions purl.org/DC/elements/1.0/ in
> http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/04/12/usageguide/simple-html.shtml
>
> It sounds like we need to revise both guidelines and the Usage Guide
> examples and make them up-to-date. People are using them.
>
> Any suggestions?
I agree, that we need to keep our documents up-to date. I suggested
end of 2001, that we should have a document history at the beginning
of all of our referential material (and of course in their metadata)
Internal links should be consistent.
Some additional work for the web-team -
rs
>
> Makx.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Makx Dekkers e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> tel: +352 2636 0150 fax: +352 2636 0151 GSM: +352 021 199910
>
|
|
|
|