Erik,
> I think my question would remain, however: What DCMI
> documentation specifies the "eor" namespace?
None, and I don't think we should. The EOR schema is not part of the DCMI.
However, this should not preclude us from using it (or any other schema) if
it defines terms we find useful. I thought the whole idea of metadata
schemas was interoperability? The eor:Schema term is the term we borrow
from the EOR NS. It is conceivable that in the future there will be others,
belonging to other resource communities. Surely we will not document them
also?
That's my 2 cents worth :)
Regards,
Harry
|