At 09:07 PM 2/13/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>I think this perhaps illustrates Rachel's point about controlling the
>content of the RDF Schemas indexed by the registry - and that is equally
>vital whether they are static text files edited "by hand" or files
>generated from a database.
I absolutely agree with Rachel and Pete about this, but I think we have
demonstrable proof of creeping into out-of-topic discussion threads :). I'd
appreciate feedback from the chairs if this is in scope or out. Seems to me
the focus of this group should be on registry requirements (which are
largely content independent).
If its the view of the chairs to have this discussion here (rather than
dc-usage, etc.) I took a crack at re-representing the DCQ document in a
more machine processable manner... if appropriate, comments are welcome.
- http://www.w3.org/2001/11/26/dcq
-
http://www.w3.org/2001/10/navigate/view?subject=http%3a//www.w3.org/2001/11/26/dcq%23
If the chairs feel that this should discussion should be done elsewhere
they have my permission to forward this message to the appropriate list.
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead mailto:[log in to unmask]
w3c world wide web consortium tel:1.614.763.1100
|