Hi Phil,
I had a read through the summary document you sent and my only immediate
comment relates to the "level of expertise with IMS MD" question. At the
moment the two options are novice & expert. As you rightly pointed out it's a
bit of a stark choice and I'm not sure I know many people who would be brave
enough to claim to be expert in using IMS MD! I would suggest asking
respondents to choose form a list of statements along the lines of:
I have no prior knowledge of IMS MD
I am aware of IMS MD
I am familiar with IMS MD
I have attempted to implement IMS MD
I have successfully implemented IMS MD
You could also invite respondents to comment on their choice.
Just a suggestion!
Bye for now
Lorna
Phil Barker wrote:
> Hello CETIS Metadata Interest Group,
> I hope you all had a good break. One piece of work which I didn't
> quite manage to get out to you before the holidays was the summary of
> our discussions about a survey of who is using IMS metadata, why, and
> how. Here it is now.
>
> Any comments would be welcome. In particular:
> -Have I forgotten/misinterpreted anything from he discussions
> -Can anyone think of anything else we should ask about
>
> Bets wishes, Phil.
>
> --
> Phil Barker Learning Technology Advisor
> ICBL, Department of Computing and Electrical Engineering
> Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS
> Tel: 0131 451 3278 Fax: 0131 451 3327
> Web: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/~philb/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: IMS_use_survey.rtf
> IMS_use_survey.rtf Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Encoding: base64
--
Lorna M. Campbell
Research Fellow
Centre for Academic Practice
University of Strathclyde
0141 548 3072
[log in to unmask]
|