That was a very powerful & illuminating mail, Chris, its local precision
made me understand better than before the way modern governments orchestrate
*events & manipulate, engineer as you put it, people's (re-)actions. But I
don't quite understand yet the factual logic of
<The kids are doing what the
social engineering of the government is inciting, in effect. In the final
analysis the Carr Labor Government as good as lit those fires but then that
is the beauty of cybernetic social engineering. You can always deny
responsibility and blame a scapegoat.>
A scapegoat is usually innocent of the crime for which s/he is ostensibly
punished, in this case not. I don't quite grasp how those kids are innocent
of lighting the fires, even if social engineering predisposed them to do it
~ but how did it do that? I am genuinely unclear about this. I do understand
that their guilt is less than that of a venal & self-aggrandising power
structure using it (their guilt) to divert attention from the real
exploitative crime(s) & the cui bono aspect of the situation, pacifying
critical social unease & creating a fake consensus. Perhaps you could
clarify that point.
Martin
|