JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2002

PODIATRY 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Orthotic Abuse by Podiatrists

From:

Bruce Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:05:09 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (389 lines)

Paul
    I'll try to make this the last comment on this subject.  There are
plenty of articles done in Peer Reviewed Journals that are for lack of a
better phrase, "are just shit!"  I respect your view and your point, but
that doesn't change the point that just because it hasn't been "Journaled,"
doesn't mean it doesn't work.
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Bowles" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Orthotic Abuse by Podiatrists


> Tony stated,,
>
> "Do you feel that it is fairer to prescribe orthoses that may resolve the
> patient`s complaint in a couple of visits, and last for a long period, or
to
> use another avenue .eg. ultrasound twice a week at a cost per
consultation."
>
> With all due respect Tony, I feel you are straying from the initial
> posting - in response to you point above, the word "MAY" is a very
poignant
> point.  You have no proof that orthoses are any better at curing foot pain
> than ultrasound is.  I am assuming you are referring to soft tissue
> inflammatory related conditions when we talk about this.  Don't get m
wrong
> I understand where you are coming from mechanically - but my initial point
> remains - you have no proof that orthoses are doing NO HARM long term.
You
> can find several peer reviewed papers on the benefits of theraputic
> ultrasound in several well respected journals - medical, physio, chiro and
> the likes.  I can't seem to find a peer reviewed paper supporting the use
of
> orthoses in biomechanically related conditions, and more importantly I
> cannot find a peer reviewed paper that tells me they will do NO HARM to
the
> patient in the long term.
>
> Again, don't take this the wrong way, I utilise orthoses when I need to as
a
> last possible resort - but my initial argument concerned Pods who knew
> NOTHING else but to prescribe orthoses - and most of them did not know WHY
> they were doing it.
>
> The bottom line is USE CAUTION - I wonder what we will find in 50 years
from
> now in research regarding orthotic use?
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> Paul Bowles
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tony" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Orthotic Abuse by Podiatrists
>
>
> > Paul,
> > In regard to the over prescription of orthoses, I am sure there are
> > individuals, and not just podiatrists who are out to make a profit.
> > However, the patient is also a consumer and has the choice to go
elsewhere
> > if unhappy with the service provided. I currently work in the NHS and
> > prescribe a fair amount of orthoses, as well as employing other
> modalities.
> > There is no profit, however , if a private practitioner chooses to
charge
> a
> > certain price for his orthoses, that is for that individual to decide
and
> > for the consumer to make an "informed" decision.I have patients request
> > specific orthoses, not because they are functionally better, but look
> better
> > and are prepared to pay for them!
> > I also believe that there are practitioners that use other treatment
> > modalities, that could be questionable in regard of cost.
> > Do you feel that it is fairer to prescibe orthoses that may resolve the
> > patient`s complaint in a couple of visits, and last for a long period,
or
> to
> > use another avenue .eg. ultrasound twice a week at a cost per
> consultation.
> > This is for the practitioner to decide with the patient, there will
always
> > be inequalities in cost, in most cases the consumer has a choice
> > regards
> > Tony Achilles
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Paul Bowles" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: Orthotic Abuse by Podiatrists
> >
> >
> > > Andrew and others,
> > >
> > > You are not the only one it freightens mate, it scares the living
> > daylights
> > > out of me and that is why I choose to speak up.  I agree with this
> comment
> > > whole heartedly but unfortunately this is the nature of the beast.
> > >
> > > Tony stated:
> > >
> > > "How does it - that makes no sense? None of us (I think) work for
> charity,
> > > so there has to be some profit in working, somewhere. If you are in
> > private
> > > practice Paul, and I assume from your sentiments that you *don't* make
> any
> > > profit from the provision of foot orthoses and orthomechanical
> treatment,
> > > then how do you survive and pay the bills?"
> > >
> > > Thats not what I stated Tony.  I was simply implying that some
> Podiatrists
> > > have an extreme overtendency to overprescribe foot orthoses for NO
> > APPARENT
> > > REASON - hence the motives of profit need to be questioned.  I made no
> > > mention of charity work, and I am well aware of the bills and
outgoings
> > > associated with MY private practice.  I survive rather well and am
> always
> > > booked at least a  few weeks in advance, and I do not believe in
> > > overprescription - hence point proved I do not rely on orthoses to pay
> my
> > > bills and survive.  That is not to that I do not prescribe them, I do
> when
> > I
> > > deem it necessary.
> > >
> > > Tony cont'd:
> > >
> > > " Do you derive any profit from seeing somebody to remove a plain old
> run
> > of
> > > the mill corn, after all consumables and normal overheads are
accounted
> > > for?"
> > >
> > > Um, the answer to that is yes.
> > >
> > > Cont'd:
> > >
> > > "Where do you draw the line? Is making *any* profit from providing a
> > service
> > > unacceptable?"
> > >
> > > No  - making a profit is not unacceptable - you get paid for the
service
> > you
> > > provide, that is how the world goes around.  But can I ask you a few
> > > questions Tony?  How much do you charge for a pair of orthoses?
> Assuming
> > > you are in Australia, it should cost you around $120 with full covers
> and
> > > soft tissue supplementations from the lab.  I'm betting you sell them
to
> > > your patients for AT LEAST double that probably more.  So I raise the
> > issue
> > > once again for you - why do you deserve to make over 100% profit on
> > > something you put in a cardboard box and send away?  Why not charge
the
> > > patient $150 - making orthoses much more affordable to lower socio
> > economic
> > > areas ofd the community who require them (if they are so good!)
Surely
> > you
> > > make profit from your consultations, or do you do that for CHARITY?
> > >
> > > This rule of course does not apply to those podiatrists who
manufacture
> > > their own orthoses with their own hands.  It is a time consuming
> activity
> > > which takes a few hours to complete - hence the payment.
> > >
> > > Jeff also stated:
> > >
> > > "I think when it comes to podiatrists who over prescribe orthoses, you
> may
> > > be attempting to make the exception appear like the rule.  It also
> appears
> > > to me from your comments that you do not recognize the same beneficial
> > > qualities of orthoses as some of your colleagues."
> > >
> > > I don't know about that Jeff - the Podiatrists I see who prescribe
> > orthotics
> > > usually have no idea WHY they are doing it - again it scares the
living
> > hell
> > > out of me, especially considering we have NO long term evidence to
> support
> > > their safe use.  Once again your arguments falls down due to the point
> > that
> > > YOU do not believe that I recognise the beneficial qualities of
> orthoses -
> > > maybe you do not recognise my qualifications as a Podiatrist either?
I
> > > recognise the potential benefits Jeff, do you recognise the potential
> > harm?
> > >
> > > Jeff also stated:
> > >
> > > "I have no problem with your position which I'm sure is honest and
based
> > on
> > > your experiences and personal perspective.  But other podiatrists may
> have
> > > different experiences than you, and may find orthoses to have a
broader
> > > application."
> > >
> > > Sure agreed, this may be the case, especially I believe in people such
> as
> > > Kevin who have a wealth of experience using them - but that does not
> mean
> > he
> > > is correct in all he does.  As Daryl Phillips stated a few days ago -
"
> > This
> > > then begs the question as to what you define as an 'experienced'
> > > practitioner? Could it be one who makes the same mistakes regularly by
> > only
> > > using orthotics or using them when they are not indicated but
regularly
> > > believes they are. That makes someone experienced. Not good, but
> > > experienced."
> > >
> > > Jeff I see so many patients who complain to be about MULTIPLE pairs of
> > > orthoses that have been forced upon them year after year - surely this
> is
> > > not coincidence or simple misdiagnosis?  The reason patients pusrchase
> > them
> > > is that patients go to someone for help and they belive what they are
> told
> > > by that so called experienced person.  I cannot tell you the amount of
> > times
> > > collegues have commented to me regarding how they SELL their
orthoses -
> > all
> > > the little "tricks of the trade".  Patients even comment to me that
they
> > > were SOLD their orthotics and not given them.  Until we actually
> > understand
> > > HOW they work, the only application that orthoses have is BROAD!
> > >
> > > To put an end to my comments regarding this thread - because it really
> is
> > > getting old - if there was a national inquiry by the ACCC into the use
> of
> > > orthoses i'm sure alot of Podiatrists/Physio's and Chiro's would be in
> > > trouble :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > > Paul Bowles
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Andrew Tindall" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:19 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Orthotic Abuse by Podiatrists
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > Well, a very interesting debate!
> > > >
> > > > Going back to Simon's original posting, and drawing on the issue of
> > > competence, I doubt (knowing where Simon stands)that the physios he
> refers
> > > to, were complaining about HIM overprescribing orthoses!  They were
> > probably
> > > refering to a host of others.
> > > >
> > > > Now, what I am about to say refers to NONE of the regular (or even
> > > irregular) contributors to this mailbase.
> > > >
> > > > There are many many podiatrists out there who prescribe orthoses
> > > inappropriately, or because they do not fully understand what they are
> > > doing.  I know of someone who qualified and within a few months had
set
> up
> > > private practice calling herself and expert in biomechanics.  This was
> > > certainly news to her lecturers judging by their comments on her
> > abilitiesvs
> > > her claims.
> > > >
> > > > I know of many people who would hold up their hand and say they know
> > very
> > > little about biomechanics, and yet they will prescribe orthoses.  What
> > > verges more on incompetence - getting something wrong or doing
anything
> > > knowing full well you don't know what you are doing?  These people
will
> > look
> > > at a biomechanics case and wonder about it, and say 'coo, look, they
> > > overpronate, I'd better do an orthosis' and away they go with often a
> poor
> > > cast, an an arbitary 4 degree rearfoot wedge without any thought about
> why
> > > the patient pronates in the first place, or what relevence it has to
the
> > > condition they are presenting with.
> > > >
> > > > You may think I'm am being cynical, but this is what I have seen,
and
> it
> > > frightens me.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> > > >
> > > > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > > > leave podiatry
> > > > to [log in to unmask]
> > > >
> > > > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> > >
> > > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > > leave podiatry
> > > to [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> >
> > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > leave podiatry
> > to [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
>
> to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> leave podiatry
> to [log in to unmask]
>
> Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager