JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2002

PODIATRY 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions Conference

From:

"Wm.J. Liggins" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:27:23 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (462 lines)

Dear Stephen

Thanks for yours.  I am sure that you are correct in that there are places
available for the training of Podiatric Surgeons.  The difficulty seems to
be in creating the services/units.
Please guard your Orthopaedic Surgeon very carefully!  (S)he is the
exception which proves the rule.  If I can offer any help, please let me
know.

Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions Conference


> Dear Bill,
>
> Thank you for your comments, I would have to say that I do not have any
> figures to support my comments with regard to the increased number of
> Podiatric Surgeons or surgical units. This was largely based upon my
> impressions at conference and on conversations with members (in the bar
> etc.) they seemed to present a very positive picture, with more people
> undertaking the training and undertaking surgery, development of (I
thought)
> more surgical pupillage places (some I think advertised within the SCP
> journal).
>
> I am saddened to hear that this is not so, as Podiatric Surgery is again
one
> of those areas where Podiatrists have I believe made a real impact on
health
> care provision/standards of care. My local Orthopaedic Surgeon, has
> experience of working in the USA, he has a positive view of Podiatry and
was
> surprised that my department did not do foot surgery (other than nail
> surgery - phenolisation).
>
> Podiatric Surgery is sadly lacking in Scotland and an area that needs
> developing. There will be a limit I think to the number of surgical posts
> simply because of the small population in Scotland and its geography, but
> nevertheless a real need.
>
> With regard to the development of a General Podiatric Council, I
reluctantly
> agree with you, I know that we will not (happy to eat my words if proved
> wrong) achieve a GPC through the HPC, but just feel we need to demonstrate
> that we have tried this route, but failed. If that makes any sense? It
> certainly does not preclude using other routes/mechanisms at the same
time;
> this makes me sound uncomfortably like a politician :-)
>
> Kind regards
>
> Stephen
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wm.J. Liggins" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 12:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions Conference
>
>
> > Dear Stephen
> >
> > Could you please list the new Podiatric Surgical units created over,
say,
> > the last 18 months, and the new Consultant Podiatric Surgeon posts?
This
> is
> > not a 'loaded' question, but as a Podiatric Surgeon I am unaware of any
> new
> > units/posts which have not been the result of expansion from adjacent
> > services or the result of work by individual Podiatric Surgeons.
> > Whilst not wishing to enter the private/NHS fray (I carry out both NHS
and
> > private treatment), I cannot agree that there is even a remote
possibility
> > of creating a General Podiatry Council from within the HPC.  That body
> would
> > see it as the first of a 'death by a thousand cuts' and strenuously
oppose
> > it.  From your posting I think that we all agree the ideal outcome,
there
> is
> > simply disagreement on the way to get there.  Perhaps a discussion with
> the
> > representative body of the Chiropractors would be a reasonable step?
> > John Mason is absolutely right.  To put it more crudely, if someone is
> > burying you in a trench of ordure there are only two reactions possible.
> > One is to lie down and invite them to carry on shovelling, the other is
to
> > stand up and throw it back.  I submit that we are guilty of doing the
> > former, whilst we SHOULD be doing the latter.
> >
> > Bill
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stephen Moore" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 11:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions Conference
> >
> >
> > > Akbal,
> > >
> > > I hate to disappoint you or ruin your master plan, but I have worked
> > within
> > > the NHS for over 18 years, I have seen great advances made within the
> > > Profession, within the health service.
> > >
> > > Whilst I have long supported the 'Dental Model', I voiced this as part
> of
> > > the Feet First Consultation in 1992-3? and again at the workshops
> arranged
> > > by the DOH to revisit 'Feet First' in 1997-8? (never been good with
> > dates),
> > > this model is seriously flawed and would need modification (speak with
> > your
> > > local private & NHS dentists). We need a modified model!
> > >
> > > I have NO desire to work in the 'Private sector' and object to
'someone'
> > > choosing my professional career path for me. Added to that I am a
> Podiatry
> > > Service Manager and member of the Faculty of Management. Putting
> Podiatry
> > > solely within the Private sector will solve nothing and will in my
> opinion
> > > actually damage the profession and lose us even more excellent
> > > practitioners.
> > >
> > > I not completely sure about your figures, 60% working within private
> > sector?
> > > I thought it was more like 45% with a proportion of these working in
> both
> > > NHS and Private sectors! But this is not important.
> > >
> > > I would argue that whilst many advances have indeed come initially
from
> > > individuals working within the private sector, most of these advances
> have
> > > only prospered and gained wider recognition and acceptance by being
> > advanced
> > > within the NHS.
> > >
> > > For example, Podiatric Surgery is now well established within the NHS,
> > with
> > > more Consultant posts emerging, more surgical units being established.
> > Some
> > > Podiatric Surgeons have been working within the NHS for over 20 years
> > (Nick
> > > Gilbert and Tom Galloway, for example).
> > >
> > > Many specialist fields would not be as advanced or as established
> without
> > > the NHS i.e. Biomechanics, Diabetes, Rheumatology, Paediatrics.
Research
> > > (just starting to emerge). We ARE starting to influence the Public
> Health
> > > agenda and I hope that not too far into the future you will see
genuine
> > > 'Podiatry Public Health posts. For the first time Podiatry in the
> Western
> > > Isles, has been specifically metioned within the Director of Public
> > Health's
> > > Annual Report, for our work in developing a Patient Held Record for
> > Diabetic
> > > patients presenting with foot ulceration, developing an integrated
Foot
> > > Ulcer Programme and (this is the important bit) preventing patients be
> > > admitted to hospital and having limb amputations.
> > >
> > > You do Podiatry Service Managers a great disservice, many of these
> > > professional advancements you enjoy and many of the thousands of
> Podiatry
> > > Posts within the NHS, would not exist/be established without many
> managers
> > > over many years, working tirelessly with little financial reward ( and
> all
> > > too often without the support of the Society of Chiropodists and
> > > Podiatrists).
> > >
> > > Managers need support and need expert advisory networks, and YES a
> career
> > > structure. I would agree that the Faculty of Management has not been
an
> > > outstanding success and not as radical and energetic as ACCO,
disbanding
> > it
> > > however, is not the answer, that would result in another ACCO forming,
> > what
> > > WE need to do is make the faculty more effective and more responsive
to
> > the
> > > needs of its' members.
> > >
> > > When I entered the NHS in 1983, many services were run by numerous
> private
> > > practitioners, the service was very poor, the facilities extremely
poor
> > (on
> > > one memorable occasion I was expected to treat patients in a female
> > toilet -
> > > well the previous Podiatrist had done so for years!). Sadly, many (not
> > all)
> > > of these practitioners were 'in it' for the money, fraud was common
> (e.g.
> > > practitioners claiming fees for deceased patients) and the profession
> had
> > a
> > > very poor image and little respect.
> > >
> > > The picture has changed dramatically and whilst still not yet perfect
> (one
> > > other reason I am a manager), we still have clinical facilities that
> fall
> > > short of our professional standards this is not unique to the NHS (how
> > many
> > > private practices have you visited!) and Podiatrists are still paid
too
> > > little. There are many examples of excellent service, highly trained
and
> > > respected practitioners.
> > >
> > > The Podiatry Service in the Western Isles, which is small and remote
> (and
> > > not the best NHS Podiatry Service in the world - this isn't a
> > commercial!),
> > > has I believe in its own small way helped progress the profession. We
> have
> > > an 'Open Referral System', we provide input and support to both the
> > Diabetic
> > > and Rheumatology Teams, we undertake 90+% of all of the nail surgery (
> > > increasingly on high risk patients), we have our own orthotics
> laboratory
> > > and run a weekly Foot ulcer clinic. We work on a daily basis with (not
> > for)
> > > a multitude of consultant staff and have gained their trust when it
> comes
> > to
> > > admitting or discharging patients to hospital. To give you one simple
> > > example of the benefits for the profession of remaining within the
NHS,
> > just
> > > yesterday afternoon, we had one Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon and a
> > > Consultant General Physician in the department discussing patients
with
> my
> > > staff. Our General Surgeons are also familiar with the location of the
> > > department, having jointly managed a number of patients with severe
> > > ischaemia and/or foot ulceration. How often does this happen in
private
> > > practice? The profession within the NHS is influencing strategic
> decision
> > > making at the highest level for example I am a member of a Scottish
> > > Executive Committee, I am aware of at least one colleague who is a
> member
> > of
> > > an NHS Board, my colleagues are members of various Health Board
> committees
> > > (Tissue viability, Health Promotion, Surgical Clinical Management
Team,
> > > Partnership Forum etc.).
> > >
> > > I had the dubious pleasure on Wednesday evening of announcing to at
the
> > AGM
> > > of our Local Health Care Cooperative, that Podiatry was no longer a
> 'PAM'
> > > but a 'AHP', it was greeted with bewildered disbelief, with questions
> like
> > > what is a Allied Health Professional? How can the HPC manage/represent
> so
> > > many different professions? That sounds daft!
> > >
> > > The strength of Podiatry (and I believe we do have influence), lies
> within
> > > our diversification, we had a good deal of interest in our profession
at
> a
> > > recent careers fair, this I believe was in part due to demonstrating a
> > > Doppler and neurothesiometer (children like gadgets) and the fact that
> we
> > do
> > > so much and in different market sectors (NHS, Private, Commercial,
> Sports
> > > and Leisure etc.).
> > >
> > > We have many excellent Practitioners, many excellent public, private
and
> > > commercial sector services, we must use this diverse strength to
ensure
> an
> > > effective and satisfying future for the profession, whilst securing
high
> > > levels of safety for the public.
> > >
> > > We have a professional body (SCP), we have a 'HPC', we have to work
> within
> > > these structures to secure a General Podiatric Council.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > >
> > > Stephen Moore
> > > (Head of Podiatry, NHS Western Isles)
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Akbal Randhawa" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 9:06 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions
Conference
> > >
> > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "podiatry" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 10:43 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Alan Milburn Speech to Allied Health Professions
> Conference
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Bill and all
> > > > >
> > > > > How I agree with your comments about govt intentions.
> > > > > They are hell bent on destroying professional independence in UK
> > > > healthcare.
> > > > > I would also add that the law is not far behind.
> > > > > If you believe this then you should understand how impossible it
was
> > to
> > > > > progress a Podiatry Council.
> > > >
> > > > I am not sure that this is at all so, we know that the HPC is
already
> > > > failing simply because they have had to ask the existsing Boards to
> > > > continuing to function despite having had 1 year to plan their
> > operations.
> > > I
> > > > suggest it is time that the Society pulled thier support, I
certainly
> > > > believe that this thoughly undemocratic body that obviously couldn't
> > > > oragnise a piss up in a brewery never mind professional regulation
for
> > 12
> > > > seperate distinct professions. It is a matter of some shame that we
> have
> > > > council members involved in this destruction, we as a body simply do
> not
> > > > have a leg to stand on if we continue to support this body and
> certainly
> > > > help the ministers destroy our professionality.
> > > >
> > > > They legislation in the Health Act still allows for a General
> Podiatric
> > > > Council to be created by Order in Council. We also have the option
of
> > our
> > > > own Act so know we have 2 options more than we have ever had. We
need
> to
> > > > tell the Government that this is what we want, and refuse to stand
> down
> > > > until we get it.
> > > >
> > > > 60% of our profession(state registered) work within the private
> sector,
> > we
> > > > can encorage and help more (with financial support) to enter the
> private
> > > > sector, this will show the government that we can act to maintain
our
> > > > professional credability in the private sector and this will put the
> > > brakes
> > > > on their NSF's etc. It does mean that the Faculty of Management will
> > cease
> > > > to exist but this is probably no bad thing. If they want Podiatry in
> the
> > > NHS
> > > > then they will just have to pay alot more and accept that we are
> > > independent
> > > > clinicians, the one thing they haven't done so far (profession
> > > supplementary
> > > > and allied health profession etc)
> > > >
> > > > > The govt have made it  clear that they would oppose totally any
such
> > > > attempt
> > > > > to
> > > > > create an independent body.
> > > >
> > > > So what!! DO we have to help them, I suggest we dump all talks with
> the
> > > DoH
> > > > redardless of the subject, if they want to impose change, let them,
we
> > > will
> > > > retain the moral high ground the simple fact they will not have
> anybody
> > > > advising them, including the unregistered I would guess, they cannot
> > make
> > > > changes that will not affect our human rights.
> > > >
> > > > > The DOH intend to destroy the professions ability to fight the
> > > > restructuring
> > > > > and dumbing of UK
> > > > > healthcare.
> > > >
> > > > I agree absolutely, but we are helping them and we should cease
> > > immediately.
> > > >
> > > > Akbal
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> > > >
> > > > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > > > leave podiatry
> > > > to [log in to unmask]
> > > >
> > > > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> > >
> > > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > > leave podiatry
> > > to [log in to unmask]
> > >
> > > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> >
> > to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> > leave podiatry
> > to [log in to unmask]
> >
> > Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
>
> to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> leave podiatry
> to [log in to unmask]
>
> Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager