JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2002

OCC-HEALTH 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Health surveillance for colophony solder

From:

diane romano woodward <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

diane romano woodward <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:02:50 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

Can I ask the group if they feel that annual or other frequency spirometry
is actually of any use in the situation of exposure of asthmagens. Would
not a questionnaire be sufficient with more intensive follow up of those
experiencing symptoms e.g.frequent peak flow readings over a week , at home
and work? This combined with the instructions to contact OH if symptoms
arise before the next health surveillance? Your comments please..

Many thanks
Diane Woodward

---- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart Cooper" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: Health surveillance for colophony solder


> Hi Alan,
>
> Please excuse me if I cover things that you know.
>
> The quick answer to your question is that I cannot remember from my brief
> spell in manufacturing of any particular threshold.  I think that the
answer
> would be that it would depend upon the COSHH risk assessment, as always.
>
> Every work area obviously has different levels of control methods and
> therefore different thresholds - with the gold star in this case being
> ventilation.  Others only use PPE.  I think the usual line is "Where there
> is a likelihood of symptoms occurring in the individual workplace, a
health
> surveillance programme should be established ....".
>
> There are three HSE leaflets that you may or may not know of that are
quite
> good - 'Solder Fume and You" (IND(G) 248L, 'Controlling health risks from
> rosin (colophony) based solder fluxes' (IND(G) 249L) and, most usefully,
> 'Assessing exposure to rosin (colophony) based solder flux fume'
> (Engineering sheet no 17).
>
> The first is available on line ....
>
> http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg248.pdf
>
> You have obviously done a risk assessment and take all necessary steps to
> get the MEL down to the EH40 requirement.
>
> My own view would be that health surveillance should not be necessary
where
> people only have occasional use of solder where there is adequate controls
> in place.  I would place regular users on a programme though.
>
> Clearly education for all users will be important, particularly with
regard
> to health effects to look out for; as you know dermatitis and asthma are
the
> primary issues.  There may also be some argument for screening those to be
> exposed, even occasionally, to ensure that they do not have any
> pre-disposing medical condition that may make them particularly
susceptible.
>
> I have looked in my 'little black book' of good websites.
>
> Try Wokingham government:
>
>
http://www.wokingham.gov.uk/sys_upl/templates/StdRight/StdRight_disp.asp?pgi
> d=4482&tid=71
>
> BBC Safety:
>
> http://www.bbc-safety.co.uk/guidance/coshh/solder.html
>
> This answer is probably is as useful as a chocolate fire guard isn't it?!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Stu.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Swann, Alan B" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 1:38 PM
> Subject: Health surveillance for colophony solder
>
>
> > Dear all,
> > What is a sensible threshold for keeping people working with solder fume
> > under health surveillance?
> >
> > We have many occasional users of solder in College: technicians who on
an
> > intermittent basis will carry out repairs or make up bespoke electrical
> > rigs, or students on project work. There is lots we can & are doing on
> > prevention of exposure, but we'll be left with a rag-bag of situations
> where
> > we cannot be certain that no exposure will occur. However, there are
real
> > practical (& credibility) difficulties on having a policy which says
> survey
> > every user who may be exposed, irrespective of frequency & duration of
use
> > etc.
> > Anyone out there  got a sensible, defensible, marketable threshold?
> >
> > Ps Thanks (Occ-Health discussion group) for the wonderfully sensible
> > discussion over the week on how to handle conflicting fitness reports.
> >
> >
> > Dr. Alan Swann, BM, AFOM
> > Director of Occupational Health
> > Occupational Health Service
> > Imperial College Health Centre
> > Watts Way
> > London
> > SW7 1 LU
> > Tel:    +44 (20) 7594 9385
> > Fax:    +44 (20) 7594 9407
> > http://www.ad.ic.ac.uk/occ_health/ <http://www.ad.ic.ac.uk/occ_health/>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager