JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  2002

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: NYTimes.com Article: At Risk: Weighing Odds and Babies

From:

Maggie Banks <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:45:01 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

Does anyone have the online study that they can copy and send? The article
doesnt make sense - 4.54% transfer rate sounds very low to me!
regards
Maggie Banks

15 Te Awa Road, RD 3, Hamilton, New Zealand
Ph: 64 7 856 4612
Fax: 64 7 856 3070
Website at www.birthspirit.co.nz
Email: [log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: Sarah Stewart <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: NYTimes.com Article: At Risk: Weighing Odds and Babies


Hello everyone

this article is doing the rounds at the moment.

Regards
Sarah Stewart


At Risk: Weighing Odds and Babies

August 6, 2002
By JOHN O'NEIL






Giving birth at home is riskier both for the child and the
mother, even in uncomplicated pregnancies, according to a
new study.

The results, which were published in the August issue of
the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, found that the risk of
neonatal death was almost twice as high when the delivery
was planned and begun in the home.

In addition, low Apgar scores evaluating the newborn's
health were more common in children born at home.

The risk of death was higher still for children born at
home to first-time mothers; those mothers were more likely
to have prolonged labor or postpartum bleeding.

The study, led by Dr. Jenny W. Y. Pang of the University of
Washington School of Public Health, looked at records of
the 6,133 births that were completed or begun in a home in
the state from 1989 to 1996. These were compared with
10,593 hospital deliveries.

The home birth group included 279 cases in which mothers
were transferred to hospitals after delivery was attempted
at home. None of the pregnancies involved known
complications.

Women who planned to give birth at home tended to be older
and were more likely to be married, white, nonsmokers, to
have insurance and to be better educated - factors usually
associated with lower risks in delivery.

The study said deaths from congenital heart disease and
respiratory distress occurred more frequently in home
births, "two causes that might be expected to be amenable
to prevention in the hospital setting."

Dr. Pang noted that the number of deaths was low in both
groups. "But women should be aware that this is a possible
consequence of giving birth at home," she said. "We're not
saying you can't do this, but that a woman has to make a
decision about the risks."

Patricia Murphy, a nurse-midwife who is a researcher at
Columbia University, noted that other studies have found
smaller dangers, particularly if women with risk factors
are steered to hospitals and a backup plan is made.

"A certain number of women are going to choose this no
matter what," she said. "We have to make sure they are
served as appropriately as possible."

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/06/health/womenshealth/06RISK.html?ex=1033395
987&ei=1&en=8299d08f94840116



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[log in to unmask] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[log in to unmask]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager