PLEASE NOTE MY NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS:
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Automatic digest processor" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "Recipients of LIS-CILIP-REG digests" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:08 AM
Subject: LIS-CILIP-REG Digest - 28 Oct 2002 to 30 Oct 2002 (#2002-85)
> There are 4 messages totalling 101 lines in this issue.
>
> Topics of the day:
>
> 1. Content of PDR (2)
> 2. Proforma + portfolio
> 3. FW: Content of PDR
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:55:04 -0000
> From: Sue Farley <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Content of PDR
>
> May I ask a question..
> Do people think is it best to include a 'little bit of everything' in
their
> report, thus giving a general overview, or concentrate in detail on the
> things they do most, at the expense of the other 'bits' (if you see
what
> I mean).
>
> Sue
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:38:10 +0000
> From: Elizabeth Clark <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Content of PDR
>
> Having just received my Chartership in September I found myself writing
> 300/400 words about a few specific pieces of work i.e. drafting a
> Collection Management policy which a team then licked into shape and being
> a representative of the library at the planning meetings of a small
> community initiative. Both sound grander than they were, but I
concentrated
> on what I learnt, would have done diffently etc. and referred back to
> theory I had studied at Library School e.g. contributing to team meetings.
>
> Liz Clark
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Staff,
> Lauder College, Halbeath,
> Dunfermline, Fife. KY11 5DY.
> Tel: (+44)-1383-845000
> Fax: (+44)-1383-845001
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:47:58 +0000
> From: Lucy Atkinson <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Proforma + portfolio
>
> How are candidates who registered after April 2002 tackling the new method
> of Route A chartership submission - proforma + portfolio? How different do
> you think it is to the old PDR format? The training programme I am
> following was devised under the old method and sticks very closely to
those
> requirements. It's very difficult to now decide what to include based on
> that because the sections are now different. Is anyone else finding this?
>
> Lucy Atkinson
> Cataloguer
> Wokingham District Council
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:48:46 -0000
> From: "Johnston, Claire" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: FW: Content of PDR
>
> This is something I'm struggling with. What about all those areas that you
> have to cover to meet the assessment criteria? I've ended up writing about
a
> lot of areas, trying to show I've gained experience in all of them. In
doing
> so I haven't been able to write about anything in real depth.
>
> Has anyone else fallen into this trap?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elizabeth Clark [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 30 October 2002 14:38
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Content of PDR
>
>
> Having just received my Chartership in September I found myself writing
> 300/400 words about a few specific pieces of work i.e. drafting a
> Collection Management policy which a team then licked into shape and being
> a representative of the library at the planning meetings of a small
> community initiative. Both sound grander than they were, but I
concentrated
> on what I learnt, would have done diffently etc. and referred back to
> theory I had studied at Library School e.g. contributing to team meetings.
>
> Liz Clark
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Staff,
> Lauder College, Halbeath,
> Dunfermline, Fife. KY11 5DY.
> Tel: (+44)-1383-845000
> Fax: (+44)-1383-845001
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This
communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as
an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial
product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official
statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information
is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All
information is subject to change without notice.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of LIS-CILIP-REG Digest - 28 Oct 2002 to 30 Oct 2002 (#2002-85)
> *******************************************************************
|