Thanks for your views. I agree with Colin that where there exist a 'final'
portfolio there is likely to be a convergence of learning outcomes - on the
basis that the course is ILT accredited. This issue is more complex in the
case of colleagues who find themselves halfway through a course when moving
to other insitution. Is the practice of 'top-up' porfolio - to demonstrate
achievement of all learning outcomes for a specific module - acceptable? It
may seem pretty unfair to colleagues who have in effect already covered
much of the ground in a different way.
The issue of equivalence between SEDA and ILT accredited courses is less
crucial (in fact SEDA accredited courses are also recognised by ILT )
It would be useful to survey the sector to establish what practices prevail.
Joelle
|