JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2002

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: Policy Post 8.21: Some Positives in New ICANN Agreement, B ut Key Features Are Missing

From:

J Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Interdisciplinary academic study of Cyber Society <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:49:18 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (183 lines)

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 03 October 2002 15:46
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Policy Post 8.21: Some Positives in New ICANN Agreement, But
Key Features Are Missing



CDT POLICY POST Volume 8, Number 21, October 3, 2002

A BRIEFING ON PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES AFFECTING CIVIL LIBERTIES ONLINE
from
THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY

CONTENTS:

(1) Some Positives in New ICANN Agreement, But Key Features Are Missing
(2) Shorter Term, Greater Oversight Put ICANN Under Scrutiny
(3) ICANN Must Address Mission Limits, Representation
(4) Public Meeting in Shanghai, October 27 - November 1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) SOME POSITIVES IN NEW ICANN AGREEMENT, BUT KEY FEATURES ARE
MISSING

On September 20, the U.S. Department of Commerce renewed its Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers), the controversial organization that oversees the Internet's
core numbering and addressing functions. The MOU authorizes ICANN to
continue its activities for another year while laying out a "checklist"
of reforms and activities for the next year.

Although there are several positive developments in the MOU, it misses the
mark on others and is generally a missed opportunity. Most positively, the
new agreement extends ICANN's mandate for just one year and requires
regular status reports -- a signal that there may be increased and
much-needed oversight of ICANN by the U.S. government this year. The MOU
also presses ICANN to make progress on issues of accountability,
transparency, and the security of the systems it administers.

Tough talk from Commerce about the MOU was not matched with tough action,
despite the government's "frank disappointment" with ICANN's slow progress.
The new MOU does not impose any real constraints on the scope of ICANN's
powers and authority, leaving the door open to unaccountable and
potentially harmful regulation of the Internet by ICANN. It also permits
ICANN to continue skirting the issue of giving the Internet public a
meaningful voice in its governance.

While a step forward, the MOs renewal is a missed opportunity to effect
substantive reform at ICANN, deferring yet again the changes needed to
stabilize ICANN and make it accountable for its actions.

The new MOU is available at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/agreements/
amend5_09192002.htm

The Department of Commerce's public statement is available at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/agreements/
docstatement_09192002.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------

(2) MOs SHORT TERM, TIGHTER OVERSIGHT PUT ICANN UNDER SCRUTINY

ICANN's authority over critical Internet functions means that
accountability, transparency, and representation are of the highest
importance for it. ICANN's power ultimately derives from its MOU with
Commerce; if ICANN is not conducting itself appropriately, the MOU is
a powerful lever for change.

Unlike previous versions, the new MOU places several new requirements on
ICANN and tightens Commerce's oversight, incorporating several items
recommended by CDT and other observers.

The MOU obliges ICANN to improve the transparency of its policymaking and
requires it to advance long-delayed accountability provisions that would
establish outside review of contentious decisions. Commerce stated that it
expects "significant advancement" in these and other areas within a year.

The MOU also requires quarterly reports, publicly posted, which will
clarify ICANN's priorities and press it to show results.

Commerce also assumed several new responsibilities for itself, including
outreach to other governments to clarify their relationship with ICANN.

As a group, these provisions set the stage for closer monitoring of ICANN
by the Department of Commerce, pressuring ICANN to make needed reforms
expeditiously. CDT welcomes this additional oversight and will be watching
its implementation closely.

CDT's Letter to the Department of Commerce is available at
http://www.cdt.org/dns/icann/020819comments.shtml

------------------------------------------------------------------------

(3) ICANN MUST ADDRESS MISSION LIMITS, REPRESENTATION

ICANN remains a highly controversial organization, but the new MOU does not
include some key reforms ICANN must undertake if it is to ever achieve
legitimacy in the eyes of Internet operators. In particular, it is
critically important that ICANN clarify its mission and establish limits to
its authority, and that a mechanism for representation of user and public
interest voices be established.

ICANN's management of key Internet systems gives it potentially
far-reaching authority to set global policies, even in areas it was not
designed for, like content control. Until there are clear limits on
ICANN's ability to engage in appropriate economic or social regulation,
key elements of the Internet community will not trust ICANN as a credible
authority, corroding ICANN's effectiveness and long-term survival. The MOU
does not explicitly press ICANN to adopt such limits to its powers, making
it a missed opportunity.

The new MOU also misses a chance to put ICANN back on track regarding the
representation of the user voice. While CDT acknowledges that direct
elections are not favored by many, ICANN has effectively abandoned all
plans to provide users and public interest groups with a real role in
selecting members of the ICANN Board of Directors. By remaining silent,
the MOU can be read as tacit approval of ICANN's rejection of user
representation, casting serious doubt on ICANN's long-term prospects for
global legitimacy.

CDT still believes in private sector management of key Internet
coordination functions. Adoption of clear, effective mission limits, and
establishment of representation for the user voice, must be undertaken
seriously if ICANN is to become a legitimate, trusted manager for Internet
users worldwide.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4) UPCOMING ICANN MEETING IN SHANGHAI, OCTOBER 27 - NOVEMBER 1

ICANN's agenda for the next year, including the fulfillment of its MOU
obligations, will be largely set at its upcoming quarterly meeting in
Shanghai, China, at the end of October. The agenda is expected to include
the Board's final approval of its "Blueprint for Reform." CDT and others
have noted serious flaws in the Blueprint, including the lack of mission
clarity and representation noted above. CDT Associate Director Alan
Davidson will attend the Shanghai meeting to monitor and comment on
ICANN's activities.

ICANN may also take some transitional action with regard to the nine
Board members whose terms are set to expire at the Shanghai meeting.
Five of the Directors scheduled to leave the Board are the "At-Large"
Directors elected in 2000; unless changes are made, their departure will
mark the end of direct user representation at ICANN. Moreover, if no new
Directors are selected, ICANN will be left with a Board of just nine
Directors to oversee large-scale organizational reform, raising serious
accountability questions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detailed information about online civil liberties issues may be found at
http://www.cdt.org/.

This document may be redistributed freely in full or linked to
http://www.cdt.org/publications/pp_8.21.shtml.

Excerpts may be re-posted with prior permission of [log in to unmask]

Policy Post 8.21 Copyright 2002 Center for Democracy and Technology

---------------------------------------
CDT Policy Post Subscription Information

To subscribe to CDT's Policy Post list, send mail to [log in to unmask] In
the BODY of the message type "subscribe policy-posts" without the quotes.

To unsubscribe from CDT's Policy Post list, send mail to [log in to unmask]
In the BODY of the message type "unsubscribe policy-posts" without
the quotes.

Detailed information about online civil liberties issues may be found at
http://www.cdt.org/

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager