Hi Ceri,
My sentence was a bit weird... :-)
I am not sure that I understand exactly what you mean (must be the fact
that I am Dutch!), but allow me to extend on what I meant.
By realising that all interaction is the complicit result from our
personal gestures, they way we interpret others' gestures, our own
reinterpretation of our pasts and our own expectations of the future, we
see that we individually have that 'choice' on 'how to gesture'.
This to me is a major insight. There is no hiding behind 'the system'.
As leaders in organisations we realise the importance and impact of our
gestures.
This reintroduces 'free will' into the conversation, if -that is- it had
ever gone.
Regards,
Frank Smits
Symphoenix Ltd
Tel: +44 (0)1732 450 495
Mobile: +44 (0)7715 423 150
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Website: www.symphoenix.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Complexity and chaos theories applied to primary medical and
social care [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Ceri Brown
Sent: 24 September 2002 12:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Exeter
Frank, You say we "can make a choice on HOW we choose to gesture."
Existentialism and semiology in the same sentence.
I guess the outcome from "signing" is a leap of faith in the future,
based on our "experience."
Ceri Brown
|