JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Archives


CARIBBEAN-STUDIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES Home

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES  2002

CARIBBEAN-STUDIES 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Week in Europe

From:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Amanda Sives <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 8 May 2002 15:14:36 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (152 lines)

The View from Europe
By David Jessop

Most weeks I am away from home. Sometimes I am
travelling in the Caribbean but more frequently I am
in Brussels or elsewhere in Europe.

For the last few days I have been in an unusually wet
and drab Geneva talking to Ambassadors, officials and
others about the position of Caribbean industries in
the complex and interlocking matrix of negotiations
underway in the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

It has been an illuminating and deeply worrying
experience. Despite the extraordinary efforts of the
six Caribbean resident diplomatic missions in Geneva
(Jamaica, Barbados, St Lucia, Trinidad and the
Dominican Republic) there is a danger that the
Caribbean’s position may go by default. The reason is
that both the public and private sectors in the
region, seemingly unaware of the finite and far
reaching nature of the WTO negotiating process, are
failing to provide the practical inputs necessary to
ensure a chance of success.

No one would deny that to most the WTO process is
numbing and arcane. Nevertheless, what is being
discussed will determine the long term viability and
competitiveness of virtually every Caribbean industry

Put another way, it may well be that by the time that
the detailed EU/ACP trade negotiations for economic
partnership agreements takes place, what really
matters will have already been decided in Geneva at
the WTO.

To explain: the first phase of negotiations for EU/ACP
Economic Partnership Arrangements will begin in
September of this year but it is widely accepted that
the ACP will not be any position to begin a serious
discussion of general principles until late 2003. This
first phase is expected to last to at least the end of
2004 although most EU member states privately concede
that delays will occur. This in turn means that the
earliest that any industry specific discussion
negotiations might occur would be in 2005 with the
objective that a final overall ACP EU agreement on
EPA’s might be achieved by late 2006 for
implementation from 2008 on.  In contrast the WTO
process anticipates that significant progress will
have been made in most areas of agriculture and
services by the time of the next WTO ministerial
meeting in September or October of 2003.

For example, while the sugar industry, is preparing
for a tough negotiation with Europe as to the future
of the legally binding ACP/EU sugar protocol, the
industry’s viability could be swept away much earlier
in the WTO process. For a number of technical reasons
relating to previous negotiations, a so-called WTO
peace clause on agriculture will expire as this year
goes on. The result may well be a challenge from
nations such as Brazil or Australia to European
agricultural subsidies and by extension to the
guaranteed price paid for ACP cane sugar.

In Geneva negotiations that affect every single
industry occur daily in small working groups, in
corridor deals and on paper through a process of
requests and responses once a general framework for
negotiations has been agreed. This has serious
implications for the future for sugar, bananas, rum,
financial services, poultry, fisheries, tourism, free
zones, textiles, export incentives, investment
provisions and so on.

Despite this, Caribbean industries hardly ever visit
Geneva and most have no WTO negotiating position.
Worse still many governments try to cover the daily
process of negotiations either from capitals or though
occasional visits by Ministers, diplomats and
officials.

The problem is that the WTO process is not as
accessible as other trade negotiations. Instead of
focussing on specific industries and sectors it deals
with general principles and crosscutting themes that
cause member states to act in coalitions that vary
depending on the issue to be discussed.

To illustrate in concrete terms the seriousness of
what is being determined in Geneva, a few simple but
practical questions will suffice.

Have Caribbean governments a clear negotiating
response to proposals in the agriculture round that
would require every state to reduce certain import
tariffs in a manner that would see sudden and
substantial falls in government revenues?   What will
Caribbean governments say when they are told for
reasons related to factory fishing that their own
small fishermen can no longer have their fuel
subsidised?

Where are the positions of the Caribbean rice sector
on agricultural negotiations; the coffee growers on
geographical indications; or the energy sector of the
liberalisation of energy related services. Has the
Association of Indigenous Banks yet prepared a
memorandum for the Regional Negotiating Machinery on
the ways in which the services negotiations may affect
the Caribbean financial sector?  Has the Poultry
Breeders Association identified how Caribbean poultry
producers might continue to defend their domestic
markets against poultry from let us say the United
States?

Has anyone undertaken an assessment of the likely
impact of negotiations in the services sector at the
WTO on manufacturing in free zones? Is anyone thinking
about the ways in which that the region’s tourism
industry might use the negotiations to ensure that the
regional industry is better able to receive a greater
part of the income that presently flows to external
tour operators?

These comments are not meant to be critical of the
institutions named. Instead they are intended to point
to the fact that urgent activity is required if those
in Geneva who have to negotiate on behalf of the
region are to stand any real chance of ensuring the
region’s interests are defended and advanced.

None of this requires an acedemic or theoretical
approach. Rather it points to the development of a
coherent set of documentation making the case of every
industry. This is essential if the Caribbean’s very
able but under resourced and sometimes forgotten
representatives in Geneva are to make a difference.

David Jessop is the Executive Director of the
Caribbean Council and can be contacted at
[log in to unmask]
May 3rd, 2002


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager