JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for BALLADS Archives


BALLADS Archives

BALLADS Archives


BALLADS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BALLADS Home

BALLADS Home

BALLADS  2002

BALLADS 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Definition

From:

"Robert B. Waltz" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

News and discussion relevant to the study of popular / folk / traditional b <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:28:42 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (51 lines)

On 1/27/02, Donald A. Duncan wrote:

[ ... ]

>As to Ballads - it's not clear to me whether you're proposing renaming
>or redefining it.  How does it differ from Ballad-L in conception and execution?

As I understand it, Ballad-L is more interested in English Language
balladry, and Ballads in all balladry. If the traffic were great
enough, it might make sense to split them. Given the lack of traffic,
I don't think it's a significant distinction. I think, if Ballads is
renamed, it needs to be redefined so that the definition matches the
name. But it's a redefinition no one will object to.

>If you're redefining it, or making a clear distinction from Ballad-L in
>concept, go for it.  If a list isn't used, it's not much good. On the
>other hand, lists are most useful if they're relatively narrowly
>defined.  My own personal definition of 'folk' music is whatever people
>sing and play by themselves, among themselves, rather than for
>performance.  And one viable definition of "traditional" is the music of
>your grandparents or earlier.  But I don't care to listen in to hundreds
>of people discussing music meeting that definition, or the current folk
>scene in the UK; I prefer the at least de facto focus of Ballad-L.   If
>I find the topics getting too broad, or the traffic wearing out my
>Delete key, I'll simply unsubscribe.

But this is a coin with two sides: If ballads or Ballad-L were too
busy, then of course they would need to be split. I've argued
for that on other lists. But these lists are both low-volume. They
need to be built up. Keeping them separate hurts both lists.

Indeed, ideally we should haul in Folktalk as well.

> > At least as long as none of them are bluegrassers. :-)
>
>Umm, Bob...  Distasteful as it is to contemplate, bluegrass is now three
>generations old, and under at least one of my definitions, it
>*qualifies* as traditional music...  Tempus fugits!

Not what I mean. "Traditional" means something different to
bluegrassers. To them, "Fox on the Run" or "Kentucky Waltz"
is "traditional." As a music form, yes, it's traditional. But
if you ask them about a "traditional song," they will talk about
the style of performance, not the source.
--
Bob Waltz
[log in to unmask]

"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
September 2023
August 2022
July 2022
January 2022
November 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
February 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
May 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
December 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
October 2016
May 2016
October 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
January 2014
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
September 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
July 2011
May 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager