JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA  2002

ARCHIVES-NRA 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: More on MyLifeBits

From:

"Steve Bailey, Joint Information Systems Committee" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:32:30 +0000

Content-Type:

Text/Plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

Text/Plain (130 lines)

Dear Rick,

Many thanks for your reply and comments.  As you probably guessed my
original message was intended to be slightly provocative and to
stimulate some (in my view much needed) debate as to the future role of
our profession in our rapidly changing information environment.  That
yours was virtually the only response I received - either on or off
list - would seem to further confirm my view.

The gist of my argument was thus not against MyLifeBits, or any other
personal electronic archive product, but was intended to draw attention
to some of the trends that are developing in information/archives
management and what they may mean for our profession.

To offer an opinion on some of your specific points:

" The fact that some individuals may choose to save everything
> indiscriminately, does not mean that everyone will"

Agreed, but this is increasingly being perceived as the goal by many
people and that in itself is interesting.  One former colleague of mine
informed me that at a conference he went to recently it was revealed
that when NARA accessioned the Bill Clinton archive recently they
archived *everything*. An exceptional case perhaps, but one indicative
of an emerging trend?  How many archivists would in previous years have
been involved in the appraisal of such a collection?  What is the focus
of the work and methodology of those archivists currently working on
this collection?

"Yet this is surely the stuff that many current and future manuscript
archivist must deal with. Thus, I think this development is a really
good sign for the archives community."

Again agreed.  My concern, however, is how prepared the current and
future archive profession is/will be to fulfil this role when the
material concerned is currently in, and needs to be preserved in,
electronic format. This *should* be our role, but are we ready and
willing to take it on? And if we are not, who will and what will be the
consequences for our profession?  Too often there appears to be this
perception that dealing with electronic records is something for
records managers and not archivists.  Not only is this untrue it may
well be the case that these old distinctions have little relevance
anymore.

I do not intend to imply that we are all doomed and that it is a
picture of dispair.  Quite the opposite.  This is an age of
unprecedented opportunity and potential for professional development.
History has never been as popular in our society and culture as now
(beaten only by gardening and cooking in our TV schedules it sometimes
seems).  We have the technology to manage and access our collections in
a way that would make our predecessors turn green with envy and there
are challenges ahead of supreme importance to our society that no one
yet knows the answers to, but to which our profession can play a
*vital* role.  And yet if we miss that opportunity now we may well find
ourselves a part of the history that until now it has fallen to us to
preserve.

Regards

Steve

Please note that the views expressed here are my own views and not
necessarily that of my employer



On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:08:34 EST Rick Barry <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> In a message dated 11/22/02 7:38:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
>
> > Now if you follow the MyLifeBits vision of the future such skill will
> > soon be redundent.  Why bother trying to work out what to keep when you
> > can keep it all?  Why waste your efforts on appraisal and selection
> > when it could be better spent refining search engines and the user
> > interfaces that will enable people to search literally everything they
> > have ever created or used?
>
> Dear Steve and colleagues: I understand and appreciate what you are saying,
> Steve, but I'm not sure that such a dim view is warranted of MyLifeBits and
> hopefully other such personal ER tools that may emerge in competition with
> Microsoft. There has been such a dearth of discussion in the professional
> community and fewer products related to personal electronic records.  Yet
> this is surely the stuff that many current and future manuscript archivist
> must deal with. Thus, I think this development is a really good sign for the
> archives community.
>
> The fact that some individuals may choose to save everything
> indiscriminately, does not mean that everyone will. Shortly after retiring
> from the World Bank in 1992, I transferred the first corpus of personal
> electronic records to the Bank Archives. Admittedly they were business
> related; nevertheless, they were personal business records maintained over a
> 9 year period using a personal e-filing system and constituting about 3000
> email records in digital form.  They represented about 7-8% of the email I
> had sent/received since I began using email in late-1983/early-1984 -- about
> the same as the proportion of Bank archives to total records at that time. I
> think many others will do the same thing give the opportunity, including for
> their purely personal, non-business records.  And even for those who do store
> and transfer all of it to some archival institution, the role of the
> archivist will still be to assess those records according to usual and
> customary appraisal criteria and practices and inform the donor/estate that,
> lacking justification to the contrary, that is what the institution considers
> appropriate to preserve on a continuing basis.
>
> Of course, if the personal records are NOT handed over to an institution for
> archival safekeeping, then we should perhaps be happy that they were NOT
> appraised by someone ill equipped to do so. If, many years later, that
> person's personal electronic records become important, then it will still not
> be too late to subject them to appropriate and professional appraisal and we
> will be glad that we had the whole corpus on which to make such decisions.
>
> In short, I think the risks associated with providing advanced digital
> personal recordkeeping tools to individuals (mainly whether the terabytes of
> data storage will  be matched with appropriate information management and
> navigation tools) are far less than than the risks we are subject to in the
> current situation without such tools.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rick Barry
> www.mybestdocs.com

----------------------
Steve Bailey,
Records Manager
Joint Information Systems Committee
Tel: 07092 302850
Email: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager