Hi folks,
And so were you, Richard!! I tried to find out how this could have
been caused. Well, in my e-mail programme, when I choose the option
reply to sender, although Richard is mentioned as sender, the mail
goes to the whole archaeobotany list!! To prevent this, the best
option
is to choose REPLY TO ALL, and subsequently REMOVE
[log in to unmask] from the list of addressees!
Anyway, this curious result of reply to sender only will certainly
have
caused these type of "personal" mails arriving at the whole list.
Please let us all try to be aware of that in the future.
oTTo
>>> [log in to unmask] 11/06 1:32 >>>
You are sending this to the entire list.
Richard Whitekettle
>>> [log in to unmask] 11/06/02 05:51AM >>>
Dear Lucinda,
a query from the publisher as they're going through the proofs -
p. 126 line 13 'has a mean January temperature of only 15oF (19oC)' -
this
conversion must be incorrect???
Can you check what this should be (refers to Q. alba).
Another query - we have your institutional/contact address in the list
of
contributors in the book as the |Peabody Museum, Yale - we'd decided to
leave it
as it was as we couldn't get in touch with you, and presumably that's
where you
were when the work was undertaken - could you please let us know ASAP
if you
prefer something else.
Hope your move is going well! (is this a new job?)
cheers, Sarah
|