Dear all especially EAD/Data Exchange Group members,
A note to announce the unveiling of RLG's NEW UPDATED Best Practice
Guidelines for EAD, which can be found at:
http://www.rlg.org/rlgead/bpg.pdf
These should prove an interesting read to all current and potential EAD
users. There has been extensive UK input in their preparation and review.
Further details will be given at the next EAD/Data Exchange Group meeting
and comments and discussion by the wider EAD community are warmly welcomed.
Members will be receiving details of the meeting soon.
See also a full copy of RLG announcement below.
Cheers,
Bill Stockting
Member of RLG EAD Advisory Group
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________
NOW AVAILABLE: RLG BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR
ENCODED ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION
I'm pleased to announce "RLG Best Practice Guidelines for Encoded Archival
Description" (www.rlg.org/rlgead/bpg.pdf).
These guidelines were developed by the RLG EAD Advisory Group between
October 2001 and August 2002 to:
-- facilitate interoperability of resource discovery by imposing a basic
degree of uniformity on the creation of valid EAD-encoded documents,
-- encourage the inclusion of particular elements, and
-- develop a set of core data elements.
In fall 2001, RLG charged a reconstituted EAD Advisory Group with revising
RLG's existing guidelines for three reasons:
(1) an awareness that encoding practices have evolved considerably since
pioneering repositories began submitting finding aids under the original
1998 RLG encoding guidelines;
(2) an appreciation that the community of EAD practitioners has grown
markedly since then, including a significant expansion outside the United
States; and
(3) the knowledge that the impending release of EAD 2002, the updated
version of the DTD would of itself require changes in the encoding
guidelines.
Nine experienced EAD users worked with program officer Merrilee Proffitt to
evaluate and rework the existing guidelines: Greg Kinney (Bentley Library,
University of Michigan), Mary Lacy (Library of Congress), Dennis Meissner
(Minnesota Historical Society), Naomi Nelson (Emory University), Richard
Rinehart (Berkeley Art Museum/Pacific Film Archive), David Ruddy (Cornell
University), William Stockting (Public Records Office, United Kingdom),
Michael Webb (Bodleian Library, University of Oxford), and Timothy Young
(Beinecke Library, Yale University). Members of the group surveyed best
practice documents from a number of different repositories and projects
before beginning their task.
Group members settled on two key objectives. One was to identify and define
the use of a minimal set of EAD elements and attributes complete enough to
assure that information in finding aids is adequate to serve the users'
needs and yet parsimonious enough to prevent excessive encoding overhead on
the creators.
Their second objective was to assure that the guidelines stand a reasonable
chance of meeting the needs of an international encoding community. The
advisory group had to be as sensitive to the requirements of international
archival standards, such as ISAD(G) (General International Standard
Archival Description) as it has to those of MARC and APPM (Archives,
Personal Papers and Manuscripts is a widely used content standard for
finding aids in the United States, written in the context of the
Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition)
The advisory group went beyond its initial mandate and has sought to
articulate a set of best practice guidelines for EAD encoding in a union
environment. The guidelines recommend additional encoding that represent
best practices for describing archival materials within the EAD
environment.
Thanks are due not only to current and past members of the advisory group,
but also to those who made their own guidelines available to the group for
analysis, and to Hannah Frost for giving the group access to her comparison
of guidelines produced in the United States. A group of outside reviewers
(Christine Woodland, Bill Landis, Elizabeth Shaw, Elizabeth Dow, Michael
Fox, Dorothy Johnston, Guenter Waibel, and Tim Hutchinson) offered
commentary and additional revisions that helped the advisory group make the
document stronger. Finally, thanks are due to Dennis Meissner for ably
chairing the group. The discussion that produced this document all took
place via email and conference calls, and Dennis provided strong, cheerful
leadership to help move the document along in a virtual meeting space.
This e-mail message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to The Public Record Office.
If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case,
please notify the sender by return e-mail immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business
of the Public Record Office are neither given nor endorsed by it.
|