Dear RTT Subscribers
John Lambert has just circulated on RTT a (rather large) Austroads
report on PROPOSED mass enforcement tolerances and sanction breakpoints.
I am the author of that report and the project is still "active" so
comments are welcome. You can either let others on RTT see your comments
by clicking on REPLY or send email directly to me at
mailto:[log in to unmask]
I should have thought about publicizing the report on RTT myself -
thanks John!
regards
Michael Paine
Paul Nordengen wrote:
>
> I am currently involved in a project for the South African National
> Department of Transport, which involves the development of a national
> overload control strategy for heavy goods vehicles. One of the tasks is
> to review the current 5% tolerance that applies to all maximum
> permissible masses (single axles, axle units, Gross Vehicle Mass and
> Gross Combination Mass). The tolerance is a prosecution guideline,
> which gives the transport operator a domain of grace, primarily to allow
> for payload distribution difficulties. This means that the vehicle
> and/or one or more of the axles/axle units may be overloaded by up to 5%
> without the driver or transport operator being charged for overloading
> – the driver merely receives a warning. The problem facing the
> authorities is that, because of the fiercely competitive market and
> profit incentives, many operators load their vehicles to the absolute
> limit – up to an additional 2.8 tons of payload on a 56-ton vehicle
> combination - without fear of being fined for overloading. If the
> vehicle is found to be overloaded by more than 5% in terms of any of the
> mass regulations, the operator is charged and loses the benefit of the
> tolerance. The load must be rectified according to the permissible
> masses excluding the tolerance before the vehicle is allowed to
> proceed.
>
> One of the possible amendments under consideration is to reduce the
> tolerance for the total vehicle mass (GVM/GCM) to 1 or 2% and to retain
> the tolerance on axles and axle units at 5% (or even increase it
> slightly).
>
> I would sincerely appreciate information or comments from other
> countries with regards any similar tolerance policies for vehicle and
> axle mass regulations.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Paul A Nordengen
> Manager: Infrastructure Management Systems
>
> Tel: +27-12-841-3945
> Fax: +27-12-841-3232
> Cell: +27-83-229-0668
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Internet: http://www.csir.co.za
>
> Postal Address:
> CSIR Transportek
> PO Box 395
> Pretoria
> South Africa
> 0001
>
> Confidentiality caution:
>
> If you have received this communication in error, please note that it
> is
> intended for the addressee only, is privileged and confidential, and
> dissemination or copying is prohibited. Please notify us
> immediately
> by telephone and return the original message to the above at cost.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
==============email signature file for Michael Paine==================
Home http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/mpaine/index.html
Road Safety news http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/mpaine/roadsafe.html
Space news http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/tps-seti/index.html
Environment news http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/mpaine/greenhous.html
PC News http://www4.tpg.com.au/users/aoaug/oaug.html
Fax Sydney (+61 2) 99753966 Phone (+61 2) 94514870
Please don't use '$','win ','money' or 'cash' in the SUBJECT of email
Due to the growing amount of junk email I filter these to 'Trash'!
======================================================================
Virus Alert - 13 May 2002
A colleague has advised me that he received a virus-infected email that
showed me as the sender. I do not have an infection and the email did
not originate from my PC.
This is probably an Outlook worm virus such as W32/Klez.H@mm that
looks up the infected PCs Outlook address book and randomly
assigns both a sender and recipient. See
http://www.commandsoftware.com/virus/klez.html
Be wary of all email attachments, even if you think
you know who the email comes from.
-------------------------------------
|