I am really curious about science communication responses to MMR.
Anyone got any news/info on initiatives they or others have taken? Any views on how the science communication community - or science more generally - has responded? How have the new organisations performed that are supposed to be an interface with the media? Any thoughts on what has been done right or wrong? Anyone who has written on the subject?
Seems to me it would make a great case study in communicating science - perhaps for a future BA/RS lecture or conference. Certainly, I could imagine the Science Minister being asked in Cabinet for this kind of information (not that I've really any idea what goes on in Cabinet)...
David
_____________________
David Steven
River Path Associates
E [log in to unmask]
T +44 (0)1202 849993
M +44 (0)7939 038832
W www.riverpath.com
_____________________
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
**********************************************************************
1. To suspend yourself from the list, whilst on leave, for example,
send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following message:
set psci-com nomail
2. To resume email from the list, send the following message:
set psci-com mail
3. To leave psci-com, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the message:
leave psci-com
4. Further information about the psci-com discussion list, including list archive,
can be found at the list web site: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/psci-com.html
5. The psci-com gateway to internet resources on science communication and science
and society can be found at http://psci-com.org.uk
**********************************************************************
|