No, what we have is a libel which because Mr. Upton believes is true
simply because he says it is due to the inherently solipsistic nature
of his circular logic.
>
>>
>>| You people feel empowered to call President Bush a murderer.
>>
>Yes. Evidence-based.
The only evidence we have is that Mr. Upton seeks to empower himself
by namecallling the President of the U.S.
But we do have evidence that Mr. Upton's RadLib faction is
irresponsible and ungrateful and in many cases seditious. At least
the Al Q act out their hateds militantly, if insanely. RadLibs keep
to the safe side of the street.
>Dear Richard
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Richard Dillon" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: 16 March 2002 17:26
>Subject: Re: no subject
>
>
>| What is absurd is to eliminate my humour from the context of the remarks.
>
>No. I laugh a lot.
>
>| You people feel empowered to call President Bush a murderer.
>
>Yes. Evidence-based.
>
> You get
>| off on it.
>
>No. I'm just scared
>
>| When someone objects, you attack them personally.
>
>But I didn't. I was replying quite politely to a message which abused me
>
>| Upton's attack was sent by name to yours truly.
>
>You respond to my use of your first name, by referring to me indirectly and
>by surname; and then even mock my name in a follow up
>
>As to the rest of it, I can't make anything of it. It seems a mishmash of
>conspiracy theory, misapprehension and worse
>
>If you want to discuss further, I'm happy; if you are going to carry on in
>this vein, I see no point. I don't have the energy for it
>
>
>L
--
|