on 3/9/02 5:02 PM, domfox at [log in to unmask] wrote:
> You can say what you like about G. Hill's funny turn in recent years (I
> think the latest stuff is great, in a barmy and infuriating sort of way. I
> wonder whether people thought Mercian Hymns was barmy and infuriating when
> it first came out, or did it attain instantly the cosy canonicity - "The
> Hill you might actually like!" - it now seems to enjoy?).
I was a budding medievalist when Mercian Hymns appeared, and it was pure
flower power!
Candice
|