JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EYE-MOVEMENT Archives


EYE-MOVEMENT Archives

EYE-MOVEMENT Archives


EYE-MOVEMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EYE-MOVEMENT Home

EYE-MOVEMENT Home

EYE-MOVEMENT  December 2001

EYE-MOVEMENT December 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

One technique for handling subjects with glasses

From:

Greg Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Eye-movement mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:00:57 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (82 lines)

Below is a description of one technique that we use to handle glasses, which
will help with both dark and bright pupil eyetrackers. Particularly, it
should help with most of the remote systems made by SMI, ASL, ISCAN, and a
host of others, including the Eyelink. We've found that by using this
technique as one of several techniques that we haven't had to drop a subject
for quite some time just because of glasses.  Try it out on your system and
let us know how it works.

The (pretty simple) technique:

1. First try the manufacturer's standard approach for calibrating the
subject with glasses.

2. Quickly check the other eye... sometimes the glasses on one eye are
easier than the other side.

If you can't get a good calibration because of spectral reflections on one
or more parts of the glasses, then:

3. For systems with automatic camera tracking (i.e., any camera that is on a
pan-tilt gimble that moves the camera around automatically), turn off the
automatic camera tracking.

4. Position the image of the eye such that the video field "clips out" the
worst reflections. This might mean putting the image of the subject's pupil
right near the edge of the video image, or even in a corner. As long as the
full pupil and corneal reflection are visible in the video image it doesn't
matter if it's in the middle of the video image or next to the edge. By
doing this, the eyetracker can't see the reflections and therefore doesn't
end up locking on to an image that is not the pupil.

5. Calibrate the system (ask the subject to remain relatively still during
the calibration). Incidentally, we've found that we get better data on all
subjects (even those without glasses) if we turn off the automatic tracking
during the calibration and then turn it back on afterwards.

6. For systems that have automatic tracking, if you wish, try turning on
automatic tracking and see how it does -- there's a good chance that it'll
get messed up again. If it still locks on to the reflections, then turn off
the automatic camera tracking and keep it off for this subject's session.

7. For systems that allow you to pan/tilt the camera by remote control, use
the remote control to keep the image of the subject's eye positioned in the
camera's field of view, keeping the reflections out of the field of view.
Keeping the subject's eye in the video field image requires attention
throughout the experiment (which isn't fun), but you can get great data, and
it's not that tough to do once you realize you can do it.

-- For the EyeLink, we found that sometimes it would have difficulties with
some part around the eye... just apply the same technique of positioning the
camera so that the irritating part of the image is not included in the
camera's field of view. Once you do this, you should not have to worry about
the reflection (or whatever irritating part of the image there is) for the
rest of the session.

--
Everyone knows that there will always be problems on any of the current
eyetrackers that you just can't handle. However, this one general technique
will help, and there are a number of other ones that work for specific
eyetrackers.

I would love to hear about your success stories with any of the brands of
eyetrackers. Related to the recent comments about "disclosure and biases", I
am not tied to any one brand of eyetracking equipment nor do I have any
formal relationship with any of the eyetracking equipment companies. I've
personally used the ASL 504, the Eyelink, LC Technologies' EyeGaze, EyeTech
Digital's QuickGlance, and an ISCAN remote system a long time ago, my first
eyetracker.  This list is a great resource.  I hope it continues to be a
friendly community.

Best,
Greg Edwards
Eyetools, Inc.
USA: (510) 440-1600
non-spam address: [log in to unmask]

--
EYE-MOVEMENT mailing list ([log in to unmask])
N.B. Replies are sent to the list, not the sender
To unsubscribe, etc. see http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/eye-movement/introduction.html
Other queries to list owner at [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager