Folks,
There are now 30 or more messages in the past two weeks in the "Problem with
our RDF schemas" thread. I guess we at least have consensus that there is a
problem.
Part of that problem has become the difficulty in following the arguments,
and part of this has to do with multiple inclusion levels:
he said:
> she said:
>> they said:
>>> but originally, I can't remember what was said
Is there anyone who could take the time to summarize what has gone on,
identify major thought clusters, and propose a resolution path? (straw
poll, policy decision, work item...?)
Also, please try to avoid simply Replying-with-inclusion. It takes a bit
more time to actually cut and paste relevant phrases to which you are
responding, but the payoff is greater clarity and resulting increase in
productivity.
thanks
stu
|