We may have to do 2 elements a week, since I don't want it to take 15
weeks! Maybe one easy and one hard (although it's really 13 elements since
CCP will be done as one).

I do think it best to continue to work in this small group (what Stu has
called the "drafting committee") so that we can have focused discussions
and accomplish the work as quickly as possible. After we have a firm
proposal then we'll open up comments to the larger DC-Libraries WG. Does
that sound like a good strategy?

Rebecca

On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Ann Chapman wrote:

> Thanks to Rebecca for co-ordinating this and getting us to this stage. My
> apologies for not contributing to the revision discussion (I was moving
> office at the time, a process that took longer than I had anticipated, with
> unexpected problems in reconnecting to our network and to email, now sorted
> thankfully) but look forward to working on the next stage.
>
> While allocating elements to people worked well for the initial stage I
> think wider input (open discussion) is probably better at this stage.
> Stina's suggestion of taking one element a week seems a workable strategy.
>
> For information, I will not be at DC-9 in Tokyo.
>
> Ann Chapman               tel:  01225 826121
> Research Officer           fax: 01225 826838
> UKOLN                         email: [log in to unmask]
>