|
|
> The information can be
> placed anywhere where it is accessible to the public...
Dear Sean,
i'm mystified.
By the way: I'm just looking at the RDF Schema for RDDL again: Could it be that there is a problem with the URI's
this scheme assigns to RDDL properties and classes?
My understanding of the namespace URI for RDDL is http://www.rddl.org/ - but the properties and classes
defined in the RDF Scheme for RDDL seem to have rather curious URI's - They are rdf:ID coded!!
Could it be that the information has been placed at the wrong place?
Why we need xlink:title to declare dc:title ? - They have almost identic semantics -
Curiously nobody seems to care that this information a machine get's nowhere - or?
Cheer
rs
|
|
|
|