On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> Alternativeness as such is handled in RDF via rdf:Alt - It's a built in feature in RDF,
> which does not need any additional work by DCMI.
I completely agree. Lest there be any misunderstanding, I do not know
of any suggestions or proposals to generalize dct:alternative, nor do I
think it would be a good idea to do so. I was using it as a purely
hypothetical example ("If people were to use...").
> Tom wrote:
> > However, dct:alternative is currently defined as "Any form of the
> > title...", so I do not see how this could happen.
>
> Thanks! This is extremely important.
Tom
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
Schloss Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
|