He,
"....so even geography is (for some purposes, and in some ways) not yet
dead, it is surely (for some purposes, and in some ways) has a lot less
relevance for our lives."
What the geographers think about this stuf? Itīs seem to me like a deja vu
in the midle of the 90īs.
Maybe the Economist is not realy part of the "...high-quality
information..." and maybe some people on this list appreciate more reading
Martinīs book and his articles than his "...collecting and synthesizing and
distributing high-quality information ...".
D. Toudert
IIS-UABC
[log in to unmask]
|