At 11:36 AM 9/26/2001 -0400, Wagner,Harry wrote:
>Stu,
>Would you please cross-post this to dc-usage. Thanks...
>
>I just noticed that DCMI Period and W3C-DTF are defined in the qualifiers
>schema (http://purl.org/dc/terms/) as a refinement of DateScheme, and in the
>human-readable version (http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmes-qualifiers/)
>they are both defined as an encoding scheme for the Temporal refinement of
>Coverage. Which is correct?
These encoding schemes were defined to be useful for both by the Usage
Board. Hence the additional rdfs:range assertions defined in the (now)
/terms Schema.
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/DateScheme" />
</rdf:Description>
...
<rdf:Property rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/terms/temporal">
...
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/terms/DateScheme" />
...
</rdf:Property>
the following however might be more useful:
http://potlach.org:8000/view?subject=http%3a//purl.org/dc/terms/DateScheme
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead mailto:[log in to unmask]
w3c world wide web consortium tel:1.614.763.1100
200 technology square, ne43-350 fax:1.208.330.5213
cambridge, ma 02139 usa
|