JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  September 2001

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM September 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Transnational livelihoods and landscapes - political ecologies of globalization

From:

Simon Batterbury <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Simon Batterbury <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:50:42 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (177 lines)

“Transnational livelihoods and landscapes - political ecologies of
globalization”


Eds.
Tony Bebbington (Associate Professor, Geography, Univ. of Colorado),
[log in to unmask]

and

Simon Batterbury (Assistant Professor, Geography & Reg.Dev, Univ. of Arizona
& Visiting Research Fellow, DESTIN, LSE),
[log in to unmask]

Special Issue of:
Ecumene (next year renamed Journal of Cultural Geographies - what happened to
the ecumenical bit??)

Volume 8, Number 4 (October 2001)

   --------
 In this collection, the contributors argue that ‘globalization’ has varying
local impacts on rural societies, and that despite its perverse effects and
distortions, these societies are often able to create new options out of the
globalisation process - market access, economic diversification, enriched
local organizations, gendered economic opportunities, managed environments.
Through detailed field investigations, the contributors take on, therefore,
a) a political economy of globalisation that fails to descend to the local
scale, or to consider the actual effects on livelihoods and landscapes b)
depressing forecasts for marginal regions distant from core economies c)
the overlooking of ‘environment’ and ‘landscape’ in geographies of global
change - whether developed in political, economic, or 'new' cultural
geography.  The introductory paper sets out the main argument and relates
this to the classic works in geography, with a plea for more ‘ecumenical’
research. The last 2 also contain some scientific analysis of resulting
environmental changes. Please send me feedback.

Especial thanks to Don Mitchell, the faculty fund at the LSE, and several
tireless editors.

Simon

   --------

Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: political ecologies of
globalization
AJ Bebbington, SPJ Batterbury
pp. 369-380

This paper introduces a collection of articles on ‘Transnational livelihoods
and landscapes’. We outline the analytical value of grounding political
ecologies of globalization in notions of livelihood, scale, place and
network. This requires an understanding of the linkages between rural people
to global processes. We argue that the exploitation of these linkages can,
under certain circumstances, result in new options and markets for rural
people in marginal regions, even though many rural societies also confront
serious political, environmental and economic challenges that likewise derive
from globalization.

Developing identities: indigenous mobilization, rural livelihoods, and
resource access in Ecuadorian Amazonia
   Tom Perreault (Geography, Syracuse Univ.)
   pp. 381-413

In the 30 years since Ecuador’s agrarian reform, indigenous organizations
have had a major impact on the country’s institutional, political and natural
landscapes. Originally formed largely in accordance with state-prescribed
models, and with considerable guidance from external institutions, these
organizations have worked to defend existing land claims; access
institutional, financial and natural resources; and make civil rights claims
against the state. Regional and national indigenous organizations have
mobilized discourses of cultural identity in strategic ways in order to
achieve these goals. This paper examines the scalar linkages between the
processes of economic and social transformation in the Ecuadorian Amazon and
the ways in which indigenous organizations have responded to these changes
since the country’s agrarian reform. I argue that the material and discursive
mobilization of identity has been central to the aims of accessing resources
and claiming political rights.

   Through a comparative case study of a regional indigenous federation and
one of its constituent base communities, I highlight the differences between
organizational histories, capacities and aims. Most studies of indigenous
movements in the Amazon Basin have considered only regional or national
organizations, often giving a false impression of homogeneity within such
movements. I contend that detailed analysis of the relations between regional
secondary-level indigenous federations and local base communities, as well as
the micro-level processes of production and resource mobilization at the
community and household scales, is crucial in understanding indigenous
organizing processes in Ecuador today.

   Globalized Andes? livelihoods, landscapes and development
   Tony J Bebbington (Univ. of Colorado)
   pp. 414-436

   Contemporary globalization in the Andes challenges the sustainability and
quality of rural livelihoods. However, it is also the case that rural people
have often addressed these destructive dimensions of economic globalization
 through a progressively deeper engagement in other types of globalized
relationship. They have done this by organizing, through engagements with
networks linking  them to international actors, and through participation in
new product and labor markets. While such global entanglements do not
guarantee local development and empowerment, they offer one of the few ways
to confront the demise of rural localities.

   This paper discusses such sets of globalized relationships in four
localities in Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. Particular attention is paid to the
ways in which the emergence and activities of local organizations and social
movements have been affected by the nature of their relationships with wider
transnational development networks, and the constraints and possibilities
that come with  these relationships. The cases demonstrate how forms of
global entanglement vary greatly across sites, and so suggest that the
effects of globalization on livelihoods and landscapes are not easy to judge
normatively or ex ante. Instead they imply that rather than speaking of
globalization generically, it is important to consider the types and
sequences of globalized relationships in which people and places have been
enmeshed. This suggests the need for historically situated studies of
‘glocalization’ in order to understand both the actual processes of
livelihood change under conditions of globalization, and the conditions under
which more sustainable and locally governed rural livelihoods and landscapes
might be built.

   Landscapes of diversity: a local political ecology of livelihood
diversification in south-western Niger
   Simon PJ Batterbury (Geog & RD, Univ. of Arizona and Development Studies,
LSE)
   pp. 437-464

 The landscapes created by livelihood diversification in rural Africa result
from human activity, from biophysical processes, and from their
interrelations. The paper explores these interrelationships through analysis
of ‘productive bricolage’ – the ways in which rural people in one of Africa’s
most disadvantaged countries have constructed a livelihood system that is a
response to local constraints and opportunities, and to broader patterns of
income- generating possibilities. Zarma farmers in south-west Niger inhabit a
region where the political economy has helped fuel economic migration and a
partial withdrawal from agriculture, and has significantly altered social
relationships and labour patterns in and between households. Zarma responses
to these conditions  include income diversification, and these activities are
expressed in their fields and their farms, as well as in their economic and
locational choices. Attempts to build bridges between the concerns of a
geographically aware ‘local political ecology’, concerned with these patterns
of livelihood dynamics and resource use, and the new cultural geography of
landscape must continue to pay attention to material practices enacted
through human agency. Social and environmental change is a fluid, non-linear,
and dynamic process in drylands that are marginal to the globalized economic
system.

   Complex communities and emergent ecologies in the regional agroforest of
Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic
   Dianne Rocheleau (Geography, Clark Univ.), L Ross, J Morrobel, L Malaret,
with R Hernandez, T Kominiak
   pp. 465-492

   Global economic change and the discourses, models and practice of
international sustainable development are major forces of ecological
construction and restructuring. The paper illustrates how the social and
ecological co-construction of forests in the Zambrana-Chacuey region in the
Dominican Republic has material consequences for distinct groups of people
and for other species in rural landscapes. The introduction of the Acacia
mangium – a fast growing tree – as a timber cash crop for smallholder farmers
in the region between 1984 and 1994 had major social, economic and ecological
consequences. A rural federation collaborated with ENDA-Caribe, an
international non-government organization, in a ten-year social forestry
experiment to develop and promote economically and environmentally viable
timber cash cropping systems for smallholder farmers. The experience of the
federation members provides a window on the workings of gender, class and
popular organization in the making of forest ecologies, and demonstrates the
influence of transnational sustainable development models and organizations
in the social and biological transformation of rural life. The encounter
between the complex social and ecological context with an apparently simple
project yields insights into the social, political and material construction,
destruction and transformation of biotic assemblages in forests, fields,
pastures and gardens in this forest/farm matrix. The research findings also
illuminate the distinct effects of the resulting restructured ecologies on
the diverse interest groups and plant communities within the regional
agroforest.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager