JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  September 2001

ACAD-AE-MED September 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Third Watch

From:

Martyn Hodson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency Academic List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:00:12 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Victor Calland" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: Third Watch


The Labour Party has generally been in favour of amalgamating Fire &
Ambulance Services, but appear to be warey of pushing the FBU to a strike
over it.

<MH> i think the ambulance service unions and Unison might have somethingto
say on the subject as well, don't forget those with long memories and/or
long service will remember the pre ?1974 ambulance service , i have no idea
what the RCN or BMA would say

There is a 1% per annum increase in the numbers of housebound elderly, and
this will increase until about 2020 when it will then begin to fall. This
is plaving increasing pressures on the Patient Transport Services and the
Government would like to privatise them to get rid of an uncontrollable
expediture.

<MH> to some extent hey already have - the partnerships between transport
/logistics companies and ambulance trusts when they've been out and
'poached' work  (the pre merger Durham AS / EXEL team that ran PTS for the
RVI in Newcastle u Tyne

 However, current public opinion on the decline of the N.H.S.
precludes them from doing that at the moment.

<MH> i think that would slip by fairly quietly especially as some services
already use private and VAS crews and vehicles for some work

 If you were to be left with
just the Emergency Ambulance Service there is a logic to combining both
ambulance & fire stations.

<MH> or locating them with other health service establishments, there's more
than few ambulance stations in the grounds of hospitals or  were in the
grounds of hospital when they were built (Middlewood and Rotherham for SYAS,
Boston Pilgrim for Lincs).

<MH> or the Staffs AST approach a small number of 'depots' and lots of real
staging points ( i.e. a physical space not just a dot on a map at a lay-by

 Not only would there be a County Ambulance
Headquarters to sell off for the real estate but there would be all the
ambulance stations,

<MH> Ambi HQs could be co-located with other health service facilities

 as the vehicles are rarely in the station and many fire
stations have been built with Government funding to provide extra bays
(covertly to provide a home for Green Goddesses in time of strike).

<MH> but there are periods where there are substantial numbers of vehicles
on stations

 With
computerised pay-rolls one Finance department could easily deal with the
extra workload and combining training facilities would be beneficial and
cost effective too.

<MH> payroll could be handled by the acute trust or the service run by a
number of trusts ( iirc Sheffield even at the height of trust fregmentation
all still used one payroll provider)

Also only one stores department

<MH> stores common with the acute and critical acre in patient environment

 and vehicle workshops.
The Control room would double in size and would still have separate
function desks but inter-service liaison would improve. Ambulance crews
would still need their own officers but at the toip there would only be a
need for one boss, and logically he would have to be a fire-fighter by
training.

<MH> Why? a combined organisation would still be doing a majority of it's
call volume in EMS work

 Small wonder the Ambulance Chief Executives are currently
running in their wheels like hamsters on speed. They just have to show dear
Tony how indispensable they are.

The huge saving in salaries of support workers and the income from sale of
real estate would have a couple of drawbacks however. One would be that
Paramedics would expect the same income as fire-fighters, and same pension
rights too, particularly if they are never on station and good old fireman
Sam is getting his forty winks.

My evidence for this? Nothing published but quite a few confidential
conversations with people in the know. Look at the logic and tell me Labour
haven't though it through.

<MH> Also how about ambulance supertrusts as have been promised in the South
east and as seen to some extent with EMAS especially as there are often
rumours of a Lincolnshire (which merged with south humberside)- EMAS merger
and occaisonal harking back to the old days when there was effectively a
trent region service ( one training school, central purchasing  (all those x
nnn xKY ford transits)


Vic  Calland

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager