It occurs to me, that if a neurologist states that the US could cause harm,
then it MUST in fact do something i.e. it can not therefore be of no
clinical effect. Also, if it can cause harm, then by this same action might
it not be beneficial if used at a beneficial dosage / protocol?
Lynda
Sydney, Australia
>Henry
>
>One of the 2 tests with positive results (calcific tendonitis) was
>contradicted by one of the excluded tests. This excluded study was not
>included in the review because it did not have a placebo group, only
>experimental and control groups. The lit review states there was no
>difference between US and control group results in this excluded review.
>
>The only study supporting US according to the review's criteria, was the
>carpal tunnel syndrome treatment. However, it is also noted that there is a
>high incidence of relapse, and the a neurologist warned US directly over an
>inflammed median nerve could damage it further.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
|