JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO Archives

PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO  August 2001

PHYSIO August 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: DPT

From:

Geoff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

- for physiotherapists in education and practice <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 10 Aug 2001 22:15:50 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

Doug,
In response to your response:

>Have you ever added up the credits for the BS PT programs and compared
those
>credits with other BS degrees? I know the credits for my BS degree should
>have gotten me very close to a MS degree. That is the "official" credits.
>Many of my courses did not offer the full number of credits the course
>deserved.
This is very true, many entry level Master's programs are simply BS programs
with a little extra research added.

>Yes. The title society uses for an autonomous health care practitioner is
>Doctor. While many of us currently practice autonomously that level of
>practice is not recognized readily by society. The DPT should go a long way
>to change that perception.
I disagree.  The title society uses Doctor for is a physician (or academian
in the case of PhD).  I do not agree with chiros and podiatrists using the
designation "Doctor" any more than PT's.  Go ask anyone on the street what
their perception of the word "doctor" is.  They certainly won't tell you
"autonomous health care practitioner."  The higher designation will only be
perceived within our profession, not the public.  They will see us still as
PT's.

>Comparing entry level education over a span of many years is dicey. The
same
>can be said for MDs, DPM, PharmD, AudD etc.
True, but we are talking perceptions here.  The perception of any other
profession of us is the same, regardless of degree attained.  Take the
current state of things... does anyone place the designation MPT above BS PT
anywhere but within our own ranks?  Not in my office.  We have one fellow
who has been working for over 30 years who could make any NCS or PhD look
like a school kid with the extent of his knowledge (myself included).  His
highest degree?  BS PT.

>Please explain. My understanding is MDs are awarded a clinical doctoral
>degree.
They are awarded the title of "doctor" as a physician, but their education
level is still accepted as being at a Master's level (except for the few PhD
MD programs out there).  Your statement brings up an interesting point
however...  Because we are now awarding entry level DPT's, how is any
consumer supposed to determine accurately the expertise of their therapist?
Isn't it confusing and misleading to use the same terminology to describe an
entry level therapist as one who has gained his DPT through the usual
progression (BS then MPT then DPT)?

> This statement seems to be a contradiction. The Doctor title is the
highest
>title in society for a profession. The MD is the biggest and boldest
>designation.
As it should be.  We do not posess the skills and education of physicians,
nor should we be claiming to be their equals in the medical world.  I think
this is the mistake many chiros have made in the past.

>Legally and professionally once you enter a profession you have earned the
>rights and privileges associated with that profession. No profession, to my
>knowledge, has ever advanced its education and status without
>"grandfathering" the people in the profession the continued right to
>practice.
Correct, but we are not "grandfathering" others in the profession to the DPT
designation.  Thus, there will be a serious rift between DPT's and lesser
degree therapists working in the field for an awful long time.  If what is
being said is true (doubtful) and DPT does raise the perception of the
public to us as advanced practitioners, then we risk alienating those with
the most experience and clinical expertise.

>The level and type of education that quality DPT programs are doing now far
>exceeds my BSPT education. It has been my professional responsibility to
>continue to stay current with appropriate practice in 2001 and beyond.
This may be true, but look at where you are at now compared to when you
started years ago.  While it is appropriate to continue to make the
preliminary education better and better, most talented PT's will still be a
step ahead of the academic programs, as their curriculums tend to lag a bit
behind current research and developing practice.  I will concede, however,
that many practicing therapists do not stay current and fall behind the
times... in this case perhaps the higher standards of a DPT program may
outdistance these therapists, but won't replace their clinical experience.

>See above. Degree granting institutions have a responsibility to award
>degrees consistant with the credits earned.
I don't mean to mislead you, I'm all for DPT and MPT programs as a
continuing advancement of base education.  It is the entry level programs
that I question.

>This is not the case. The scope of practice is the same, DPT or not.
It does place DPT's in a precarious situation, however.  They do not posess
the talents or skills of an experienced practitioner, but they carry a title
that places them above and beyond all other therapists.

>I don't see how a DPT after a BS would be more costly than a MS after a BS.
>I have not done an analysis. If you have I'd be interested in what you
>found.
Advancements in degrees are always an excuse to raise tuition.  Just look at
the average cost of tuition going from BHS to MPT in the US.  In some cases
it is 3 or 4 times as much.

>I disagree. As noted above we all have a responsibility to stay current. If
>we choose to do this by pursuing a tDPT fine. There are a myriad of other
>ways of staying current. No matter what way you choose you will have to put
>the time and resources into professional development.
Again we are talking perceptions.  If DPT does for PT as many hope it will,
who will get the higher nod: a DPT or an OCS?  I believe an OCS carries
quite bit more weight in my eyes, but will it with the public?  Not if we're
strutting around calling ourselves "doctors."

>I don't understand this point. I don't see how the DPT takes away from
other
>post professional degrees.
Because it places an entry level DPT at the same level as post professional
DPTs or PhDs.  The difference may be explained to someone who asks the gory
details, but most people take a title at face value.

>I agree with residencies however it is a separate and distinct issue from
>DPT.
I don't think so.  It calls to question what our purpose is in advancing the
profession and how we wish to go about it.  While a newly graduated DPT may
posess greater skills than a new MPT or BS PT, they would rarely have the
skills to do more than the rudimentary therapy capable of any therapist with
such a broad scope of education.  PT students are expected to learn
everything about everything PT related.  This makes it impossible to hone
the skills necessary to be a master clinician in any specific area of
practice.  I would never presume to know much about treating ACL repairs or
plantar fasciitis, but I could run the table on the advanced treatment of a
SCI patient.  This comes from specialized experience in this area, something
I did not posess at graduation.  If we want better clinicians, we need to
better prepare them for the specific field they are going into.  Very few
PT's I know hop from arena to arena; they find a niche and stick to it.  I
wish I had had the opportunity to complete a neuro residency before
practicing as a full fledged PT.  It would have greatly facilitated my entry
level abilities.  We need more capable specialists in this profession, not
generally educated "doctors."

It is a pleasure debating this issue with you Doug!
Again warm regards!
Geoff

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
December 2023
October 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
December 2021
November 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
September 2020
July 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager