The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  August 2001

DISABILITY-RESEARCH August 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

At long last!

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 15 Aug 2001 00:56:33 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (101 lines)

Dear People,

Two bits of news:

For the Accsexers amongst us, Mike Letch and myself have finally upon a meeting date for Accsex!   It's going to be on Thursday the 13th of Sept. at 2.00 pm.  It will be at DDLS - the Disability  Discrimination Law Service (on the 1st floor of the Yooralla building) at 212 King Street (near Little Bourke).

I'm sorry it's not at Family Planning - but Sally Allen is on maternity leave and now they want to charge us...  This has been part of the delay in calling this meeting - the other part is that I have been really busy with schoolwork.  I hope finish by the end of this year and graduate next May!

Also, the Exclusion and Embrace conference has accepted me as a speaker.  My talk will be a slightly amended version of the one I posted on these lists a few weeks ago - "Coming to the Spirit through Sexuality."

For those of you who don't know anything about the Accsex Coalition the following may   interest you:

                                  DRAWING A FINE LINE ON A TABOO

               by Sharon Mascall - AGE NEWSPAPER - "Body" Section.   June, 11th, '01.

"INGRID is a feisty 50-something.  Her mischievous laugh peppers our conversation, alongside references to sex, masturbation and silky underwear.

This is a woman who enjoys her sexuality and isn't afraid to discuss it.

"I think we're lucky," she says.  "We have to be far more open with our partners than other people do.  I have to take my clothes off in front of my husband and he has to position my body.  It encourages more openness in a sexual relationship"

"We" are people with disabilities.  People like Ingrid, who was born with cerebral palsy.  People whd've lost the use of a limb through accident or illness.  Anyone and everyone who has a physical, mental or intellectual disability.  The fact they may want sex is a social taboo.

"There is the fear we'll breed monsters," says Mike Letch, a disability consultant for Yooralla.  "Hollywood's partly to blame, depicting us as Quasimodos and Freddy Krugers.  In the past, if the disability was 'good enough', we became monsters in freak shows - like the Elephant Man"

Letch lost the use of his legs at the age of 21, after crashing his motorbike on a speedway track in England.  In hospital, he plucked up the courage to ask a "dragon ofa charge-nurse" whether he'd be able to have children - the 1970s euphemism for sex.  "you filthy little guttersnipe," she hissed, "if you keep your mind above your navel you might get somewhere in life"

Letch ignored her advice.  In 1997 he started work on ACCSEX - a forum for people with disabilities, their attendants and care organisations -- to work out how disabled people can gain access to safe, healthy sex lives.

Unofficially, such access has been available for a while.  Mike Lanyon is a recreation specialist, who'd never set foot in a brothel, until he was working in a private rehabilitation hospital in Melbourne 12 years ago.

"One resident was exhibiting inappropriate behavior.  He was touching the nurses -- so they asked me to talk to him," Lanyon said.

"I found out he'd been the victim of a hit-and-run in his 20s.  He'd suffered a severe head injury, had speech problems and was in a wheelchair.  He was also very sexually frustrated."

"I took him to the brothel in Clifton Hill -- the one tucked away, next door to McDonalds.  The girl was an ex-nurse; she'd worked in a head injury unit and made him feel very comfortable," Lanyon said.

"After that, his behavioral problems stopped."

Brothels became a regular outing at the hospital for those who were interested and who had the money.

Today, several Melbourne brothels employ sex workers who specialise in disability, some having rooms tailor-made for mobility-impaired clients.  The only barrier is the price.

At more than $100 a time, brothel sex doesn't come cheap.

And it doesn't address the needs of women.  Lanyon combines his job as a recreation lecturer at Victoria University with the design and development of dildos, vibrators and other sex toys specifically for disabled people.

Working with a manufacturer, he's in the process of adding a giant dial to the end of a vibrator, to make it easier to switch on and off.  He has designed a "lexi-please" that bends in many ways to cater far the mobility restrictions of some users.

All the products are being fashioned in silicone, rather than latex, to make them easy to clean in boiling water and reduce the likelihood of an allergy.

"The main problem," he says, "is the batteries.  Changing them is an issue.  We can modify the switches but then it's up to them to ask someone they trust to change the batteries" That "someone" is likely to be an attendant.  The person who drives them to work, helps them to get undressed, or cooks their meals.

Asking them to facilitate a disabled person's sex life may be controversial.

ACCSEX's research, incorporating the views of consumers and providers of attendant care, shows that lines must be drawn.  Changing batteries is one thing.  Putting on a condom is something else.

"The lines already exist,'' says Letch.  "some attendants do toileting, some do not.

We're trying to develop a care model which clearly defines what attendants can do and what they can't".

The priority is to respect ethical and professional standards by clear demarcation of responsibilities.

Attendants are not sex workers, nor will they be expected to be.

The dilemma is how to give disabled people the sexual freedom to which they're entitled, without compromising the sensitivities and professionalism of those who work with them.

The alternative -- ignoring the issue -- is not an option.

"Disabled people have always been considered completely asexual or completely deviant with nothing in the middle," says Letch.  "The fact is that we do have sexual feelings.  To ignore that is irresponsible and may increase the risk of exploitation."

His comments are backed by research soon to be released by the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, at La Trobe University.  As part of its "Living Safer Sexual Lives" project, 25 intellectually disabled adults were interviewed and asked to talk specifically about their experience of sex and relationships.  What emerged supported previous suspicion that intellectually disabled people are often the targets of sexual abuse.

"One man told us he'd been taught that sex with his peers was wrong, independent sex was wrong, but that sex with workers was OK," says Dr Lynne Hillier, the principal researcher on the project.  "Many of the women said they'd been raped or sexually abused.  In our motivation to protect these people, we are leaving them unequipped to protect themselves".

Lanyon agrees.  He recalls one case that exemplifies the need for responsible sex education and access to safe sexual practice.  "A woman came to our hospital for respite care.  She kept complaining of vaginal pain," Lanyon says.  "We discovered that she'd been using a hair curler as a sex aid and part of it had got lodged inside her.  Her disability meant she didn't understand what she'd done wrong.  The skin had healed over and she had to have an operation to have the object removed.

We have a responsibility to teach people that if they masturbate, they do so safely."
Even conservatives dealing with disability accept the need for sex education.  But how to put the theory into practice?

"We've created a brand new race of people through medical and scientific advances," says Letch.  "In the past people with disabilities or suffering accident or trauma would simply have died.  The problem is that technology hasn't caught up enough to allow their complete inclusion in society.

It's still thought that disabled people shouldn't have sex" But they do.  Or want to.

"We're tired of being told that we had the right to have sex,'' says Ingrid, a member of the ACCSEX forum.  "We want to see some practical solutions to be mooted for us to get access to sexual relationships".  Access in the form of sexual surrogacy -- perhaps where people with disabilities are assigned a sex worker to teach them about sexual experience, or access in the form of a social club - modelled on the Outsiders Club in London - that enables people with disabilities to meet and form relationships."


Jai Guru Dev (this means I'm acknowdging the spiritual "spark" in you!),

"Sundari - pronounced Soon(like lun in 'lunatic!')-DHE-ree" [my e-mail name].

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager