Subject: | | Re: RDF/DCQ implementation |
From: | | |
Reply-To: | | This list, which supersedes dc-datamodel, dc-schema, and dc-implementors, i" <[log in to unmask]> |
Date: | | Sun, 1 Jul 2001 04:45:54 +0100 |
Content-Type: | | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
|
|
Hi
On Sun 01-Jul-2001 at 02:49:59 +0100, Chris Croome wrote:
>
> There are 3 types of relation I can represent, child documents, the
> parent document (all documents apart from the front page) and all in
> line hyperlinks. For all of these I can get a URI, title and
> description.
Thinking about it I also have the language for the parent and child
documents.
And I also potentially have dcq:replaces from the redirects that get
set up if a document moves.
Is dcq:isPartOf good to use for the parent document and is
dcq:hasPart any good for listing child documents?
Also how would this HTML be represented:
<link rel="contents" href="http://mkdoc.com/help/component/"
hreflang="en-gb" title="MKDoc : Help : Component" />
<link rel="prev" href="http://mkdoc.com/help/component/html/"
hreflang="en-gb" title="MKDoc : Help : Component : HTML" />
<link rel="next" href="http://mkdoc.com/help/component/text/"
hreflang="en-gb" title="MKDoc : Help : Component : Text" />
There will be this kind of thing in the headers and in the form of a
navigation menu in pages when the site gets the CVS version of the
code and it would be nice to represent then in the metadata.
More generally should there be a mapping of all (or all the ones
that people generally use) the HTML Link types [1] to RDF DC?
Chris
[1] see: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links
and: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#edef-LINK
--
Chris Croome
http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
|
|
|
|