Roland Schwaenzl <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 30 March 2001 we adopted the Draft Namespace Policy
> http://dublincore.org/2001/03/09/dcmi-namespace/ to the
> DCQual paper - as it appeared as generally accepted by the working group.
I did not adopt this policy, and at the time it seemed as if we had not
reached consensus on it. If we are driven by consensus, then policies like
this should not be forced upon us.
We seem quite close to consensus on:
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/http://purl.org/dc/terms/http://purl.org/dc/type/
(other domain-specific vocabularies added as necessary)
If there are serious dissentions to this proposal, I suggest that they be
written up and discussed. Otherwise I suggest that we move forward with this
since it seems to have the widest agreement.
--
[ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]