JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO Archives

PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO  May 2001

PHYSIO May 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Use of Disabled Parking

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

PHYSIO - for physiotherapists in education and practice <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 25 May 2001 21:38:11 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (84 lines)

Recently my paraplegic wife and I were sitting in the parking lot of a large
shopping mall and thought that we would carry out an informal survey in
Denver of the use of parking bays reserved for the disabled.  We were so
shocked that we separately or jointly repeated our little study at a few
other shopping malls and this is what we found over a period of three months:

Out of 91 people putting up legitimate disabled parking permits inside their
vehicles at three shopping malls, not one person using them used a wheelchair
for locomotion or showed any signs of pronounced mobility impairment.  The
remainder were:

1.  Using walking sticks or other walking aids, amputees: 11
2.  Obese: 24
3.  Looked older than about 60 years: 31
4.  Middle aged mothers with several children:  10
5.  Teenagers with no obvious disability:  7
6.  Miscellaneous others with no obvious disability:   8

This does not include 14 middle aged or young women and one man who did not
display any form of disabled authorisation at all, all of whom without
exception, when politely asked "what your disability is", replied that they
"were only going inside for a few minutes" or became openly even more
hostile.  In two cases, my wife had to call the local sheriff on her cell
phone because of exceptionally threatening behaviour of women without parking
permits.  We have been most disappointed to note that the illegal use of
disabled parking is displayed predominantly by women drivers and have been
wondering why this is so.

Lest some criticism be levelled at us for judging disability by the mere
appearance of someone walking with no obvious difficulty, we do appreciate
that some organic disorders do not always manifest themselves in mobility
impairment, such as cardiac disease or severe diabetes.  However, as a
cardiac patient who lost over 60 percent of my left ventricular function, I
discovered that I am also eligible for a disabled parking permit.  To me,
that is outrageous, since the less physical movement I do, the less likely I
am to improve my cardiac function.  I would be disgusted with myself for even
considering the illegal or legal use of disabled parking for myself.

Legally, divisions of motor vehicles in different States issue disabled
parking permits only to "persons who are certified by an authorized health
care specialist as having a permanent or temporary disability that limits or
impairs their ability to walk."  So, it appears as if we have a situation
which:

1.  involves the illegal use of disabled parking permits
2.  is being abused with the collaboration of many medical professionals
3.  our informal survey has misinterpreted

Whatever reason is correct, it is apparent that some official survey needs to
be regularly carried out by the authorities and security staff at shopping
malls, restaurants and other public places.  It is bad enough being severely
disabled without being deprived of parking by some very selfish and
inconsiderate individuals.

So, why on earth do the vast majority of people using legitimate disabled
parking stickers not appear to be mobility impaired?  What qualifies someone
for the issue of disability parking?  Judging from what we have recorded, it
appears as if the majority who obtain these stickers are obese or old.  If
this is correct and these folk are not simply borrowing disabled
authorisation, then  something is very wrong with the standards of
qualification.   Non-pathological obesity and advanced years generally are no
reason whatsoever to qualify for disability parking.  After all, some regular
daily exercise is well known medically to offer health and quality of life
benefits to the old aged and obese.

It would be most interesting to hear the comments of others about their
observations regarding the use and misuse of disabled parking.  Why is it
that so few folk who qualify for disabled parking permits are wheelchair
users?  Maybe those who have to use wheelchairs should be issued with a
special red disabled parking permit which allows them to use parking closest
to the shops.    Maybe only the severely disabled should be granted parking
permits.  What do you think?

This situation often causes severe problems for many severely disabled folk
like my wife, so it really is unfair for those with relatively little
mobility impairment to use disabled parking.  As I stated earlier, I could
easily obtain medical certification that would grant me a disabled parking
permit as someone with profound cardiac damage - to me, it would be
inconceivable to do that and deprive someone in real need of that parking.

Dr Mel C Siff
Denver, USA
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Supertraining/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
December 2023
October 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
December 2021
November 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
September 2020
July 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager