JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  May 2001

ACAD-AE-MED May 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: folks who say they know how to do it (ICU nurses, paramedics,

From:

Charles Brault <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency trainee list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 13 May 2001 15:23:54 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (865 lines)

At Emergency Nursing World

http://enw.org/TOC.htm

End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring During CPR:
A Predictor of Outcome
by Jinhee Nguyen, RN MSN
Introduction
In the emergency department (ED), critical management of the patient’s 
airway, ventilation and chest compression requires the utmost effort and 
sophisticated technology to maximize successful outcomes. Approximately $1 
billion is spent on emergency department and in-hospital care for cardiac 
arrest nonsurvivors (Bonnin et al., 1993; Gray, Capone & Most, 1991). A 
reliable method of assessing the efficacy and usefulness of ongoing 
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) would conserve scarce health care 
resources, avoid futile care, pain and suffering (Sanders, Kern, Otto, 
Milander & Ewy, 1989; Wayne et al., 1995). End tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) 
monitoring during resuscitation is a promising technology, which may help 
maximize patient outcomes, while reducing futile and costly interventions.
ETCO2 is the partial pressure or maximal concentration of carbon dioxide 
(CO2) at the end of an exhaled breath, which is expressed as a percentage 
of CO2 or mmHg (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Santos, Varon, Pic-Aluas & Combs, 
1993; Trillo, von Planta & Kette, 1994). The normal values are 5% to 6% 
CO2, which is equivalent to 35-45 mmHg (Hollinger & Hoyt, 1995; Trillo et 
al., 1994). CO2 reflects cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary blood flow as 
the gas is transported by the venous system to the right side of the heart 
and then pumped to the lungs by the right ventricles (LaValle & Perry, 
1995; Sanders, 1989). When CO2 diffuses out of the lungs into the exhaled 
air, a device called capnometer measures the partial pressure or maximal 
concentration of CO2 at the end of exhalation (Sanders, 1989; Santos et 
al., 1993). During CPR, the amount of CO2 excreted by the lungs is 
proportional to the amount of pulmonary blood flow (Benumof, 1998; Lambert, 
Cantineau, Merckx, Bertrand & Duvaldestine, 1992; Nielsen, Fitchet & 
Saunders, 1990).
The primary interventions of CPR include establishing a patent airway, 
ventilation, and precordial compressions. These interventions can help 
maintain blood flow and oxygen delivery to the vital organs with a cardiac 
output of about 17% to 27% (Falk, Rackow & Weil, 1988; Gudipati, Weil, 
Bisera, Deshmukh & Rackow, 1988). During CPR, the most reliable continuous 
monitoring of the efficacy of precordial compressions for blood flow is the 
measurement of arterial or intracardiac pressure (Callaham & Barton, 1990; 
Gudipati et al., 1988). Animal studies have reported the correlation of 
coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) to the likelihood of resuscitation, but 
simultaneous measurement of arterial pressure and central venous pressure 
is required to monitor the progress of the resuscitation (Gudipati et al., 
1988; Sanders, Ewy, Bragg, Atlas & Kern, 1995). Furthermore, placing 
catheters to measure such pressures is invasive, time consuming, and 
impractical in the ED setting, especially when patient’s pulses are barely 
palpable (Callaham & Barton, 1990; Gudipati et al., 1988; Sanders et al., 
1989). Therefore, ETCO2 monitoring is one promising noninvasive method of 
evaluating patients, who are most likely to be intubated during CPR 
(Cantineau et al., 1996; Lambert et al., 1992; Sanders et al., 1985; 
Steedman & Robertson, 1990).
This paper will discuss the significance of ETCO2 monitoring and assess its 
value in predicting the outcomes of CPR in ED and prehospital settings. The 
inclusion of prehospital setting is crucial since the resuscitation from 
the field is often continued in ED setting.
Significance
The current methods of assessing the effectiveness of CPR are difficult and 
unreliable (Falk et al., 1988; Sanders et al., 1989; Santos et al., 1993). 
The presence of femoral or carotid pulsations, pupillary signs, and 
arterial blood gas (ABG) results have not shown to correlate with 
successful CPR (Sanders et al., 1989; Santos et al., 1993; Steedman et al., 
1990). Currently, palpating pulses is one of the options for assessing the 
adequacy of blood flow generated by cardiac compressions (Sanders et al., 
1989). According to Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines by 
American Heart Association (1998), assessing for pulse is indicated before 
confirming the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, a 
palpable pulse may only represent continuity of a fluid filled vessel but 
not necessarily the blood flow (Gudipati et al., 1988). Therefore, palpable 
pulse may serve as an unreliable indication of operative systemic flow.
The most direct technique to measure the adequacy of ventilation is the 
measurement of the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood 
(PaCO2) from an ABG, which can be expensive and painful (Santos et al., 
1993). During cardiac arrest, the CO2 delivery to the lungs decreases due 
to poor pulmonary perfusion (Sanders et al., 1989). A decrease in pulmonary 
blood flow will cause the accumulation of CO2 in the venous circuit even 
with adequate ventilation (Steedman et al., 1990). CO2 delivery to the 
lungs is decreased due to a high ventilation/perfusion (VQ) ratio, leading 
to arterial alkalemia (Steedman et al., 1990; Weil, Rackow, Trevino, 
Grundler, Falk, & Griffel, 1986). ABG’s can be misleading during CPR due to 
a phenomenon called venous paradox, which consists of venous hypercarbic 
acidosis and arterial hypocarbic alkalemia (Santos et al., 1993). In 
addition, ABG’s only provide intermittent data, whereas capnometry allows 
continuous and instantaneous measurement of ETCO2 (Santos et al., 1993).
The significance of ETCO2 monitoring during CPR was first noted by Kalenda 
(1978), who observed the resuscitation of three patients and monitored 
pulmonary perfusion by means of ETCO2. He reported that ETCO2 monitoring 
was helpful in assessing rescuer exhaustion. With the external cardiac 
massage, there was a slight improvement of ETCO2, which diminished as the 
rescuer became tired. Replacing the fatigue rescuer with a fresh rescuer 
resulted in an improvement in ETCO2. Additionally, Kalenda (1978) noted 
that the sudden steep increase in ETCO2 was an indication of the return of 
spontaneous cardiac activity. This study showed a potential significant 
value of ETCO2 as a guiding tool to monitor the effectiveness of CPR.
Following the observation made by Kalenda (1978), several experimental 
studies involving animals have demonstrated the correlation between ETCO2 
with CO and CPP (Gudipati et al., 1988; Ornato, Garnett, & Glauser, 1990; 
Sanders et al., 1985). The next series of in-hospital studies attempted to 
confirm the same findings seen from experimental studies by looking at 
ETCO2 monitoring during various hemodynamic stages of CPR in the ED. More 
recent studies have used ETCO2 monitoring in prehospital settings in an 
attempt to predict the outcome of CPR (Asplin & White, 1995; Cantineau et 
al., 1996; Levine, Wayne & Miller, 1997; Wayne et al., 1995).
Organization of Review
The process of gathering the related literature was accomplished by 
accessing the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases (1985-1999) at University of 
California, San Francisco. The databases contained both medical and nursing 
journals. The title word end tidal carbon dioxide in combination with two 
key words, cardiac output and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, identified 18 
articles. Majority of the articles were published by medical journals, 
whereas only two articles were published by nursing journals (Benumof, 
1998; LaValle & Perry, 1995). For the purpose of this paper, the articles 
related to ED and prehospital settings were selected for in-depth discussion.
Discussion of Theory/Pathophysiology
To understand the significant value of ETCO2, one needs to be familiarized 
with the following: normal physiology of CO2, principle determinants of 
ETCO2, CO2 gradient with normal VQ relationship, ETCO2 analyzer 
(capnometer), and limitations of ETCO2 measurements.
ETCO2 represents the partial pressure or maximal concentration of CO2 at 
the end of exhalation (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Santos et al., 1993; Trillo 
et al., 1994). CO2 reflects cellular metabolism (Idris et al., 1994; 
Sanders, 1989). There are four main stages of normal physiology of CO2 : 
production, transport, buffering and elimination. CO2 is a metabolic 
byproduct of aerobic cell metabolism (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Sanders, 
1989). As the intracellular CO2 increases, CO2 diffuses out into the tissue 
capillaries and is carried by the venous circulation to the lungs, where it 
diffuses from pulmonary capillaries into the alveoli (Idris et al., 1994; 
LaValle & Perry, 1995). The partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) of venous blood 
entering pulmonary capillaries is normally 45 mmHg; the partial alveolar 
pressure of CO2 (PACO2) is normally 40 mmHg (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Trillo 
et al., 1994). The pressure difference of 5 mmHg will cause all the 
required CO2 to diffuse out of pulmonary capillaries into the alveoli 
(LaValle & Perry, 1995). The second stage is CO2 transport, which is a way 
of maintaining the CO2 tension of arterial blood at approximately 35-45 
mmHg despite high CO2 production (Trillo et al., 1994).
The third stage is where the buffer action of hemoglobin and pulmonary 
blood flow maintain the normal level of CO2 tension by eliminating the 
excess CO2 (Trillo et al., 1994). CO2 can either be carried, dissolved or 
combined with water (H20) to form carbonic acid (H2CO3), which can 
dissipate to hydrogen ions (H+) and bicarbonate ions (HCO3-): (CO2 + H20 « 
H2CO3 « H+ + HCO3-) (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Trillo et al., 1995). The 
hydrogen ions are buffered by hemoglobin, and the bicarbonate ions are 
transported into the blood (Idris et al., 1994; Trillo et al., 1994). This 
mechanism accounts for 90% of CO2 transport (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Trillo 
et al., 1994). The fourth stage involves CO2 elimination by alveolar 
ventilation under the control of the respiratory center (LaValle & Perry, 
1995; Trillo et al., 1994). This process allows the diffusion of CO2 from 
blood to the alveoli where the partial alveolar pressure of CO2 is lower 
than the tissue pressure (Trillo et al., 1994).
During normal circulatory condition with equal VQ relationship, PACO2 is 
closely comparable to PaCO2 and ETCO2; therefore, PaCO2 is equivalent to 
ETCO2 (Sanders, 1989; Santos et al., 1993). The difference between PaCO2 
and ETCO2 is known as the CO2 gradient (LaValle & Perry, 1995). The normal 
ETCO2 is about 38 mmHg at 760 mmHg of atmosphere with less then 6 mmHg 
gradient between PaCO2 and ETCO2 (Sanders, 1989; Santos et al., 1993).
The principle determinants of ETCO2 are alveolar ventilation, pulmonary 
perfusion (cardiac output) and CO2 production (Benumof, 1998; Callaham & 
Barton, 1990; Domsky, Wilson & Heins, 1995; Steedman & Robertson, 1990). 
During acutely low cardiac output state as in cardiac arrest, decreased 
pulmonary blood flow becomes the primary determinant resulting in abrupt 
decrease of ETCO2 (Domsky et al., 1995; Wayne et al., 1995). Changes in 
alveolar ventilation can also influence ETCO2 as PACO2 closely approximates 
PaCO2 and ETCO2 (Santos et al., 1993). If ventilation and chest 
compressions are constant with the assumption that CO2 production is 
uniform, then the change in ETCO2 reflects the changes in systemic and 
pulmonary blood flow (Garnett et al., 1987). Ultimately, ETCO2 can be used 
as a quantitative index of evaluating adequacy of ventilation and pulmonary 
blood flow during CPR (Falk et al., 1988).
ETCO2 Monitoring Technologies
One way of measuring ETCO2 is with the infrared capnometer, which contains 
a source of infrared radiation, a chamber containing the gas sample, and a 
photodetector (Santos et al., 1993; Trillo et al., 1994). When the expired 
CO2 passes between the beam of infrared light and photodetector, the 
absorbence is proportional to the concentration of CO2 in the gas sample 
(LaValle & Perry, 1995; Santos et al., 1993; Trillo et al., 1994). The gas 
samples can be analyzed by the mainstream (in-line) or sidestream 
(diverting) techniques (Santos et al., 1993).
The mainstream capnometer uses the airway connector placed in-line with the 
patient’s breathing circuit directly attached to endotracheal tube (Santos 
et al., 1993).This technique produces instantaneous and accurate gas 
analysis (less than 500 msec) far superior to the sidestream technique 
(Callaham & Barton, 1990; Santos et al., 1993). The limitation of the 
mainstream technique is that it can be applied only for intubated patients 
or patients with tight fitting nose or face masks (Santos et al., 1993). On 
the other hand, the sidestream technique is more applicable for 
spontaneously breathing non-intubated patients. But, it requires constant 
aspiration of 100 cc to 300 cc of expired air/minute for analysis (Santos 
et al., 1993).
ETCO2 analyzer adapters do not interfere with ventilation (Santos et al., 
1993). However, there are several factors that can alter ETCO2 measurements 
such as temperature of photo detector, airway pressure, calibration error, 
contamination of sample chamber by moisture and secretion (LaValle & Perry, 
1995; Sanders, 1989). Furthermore, falsely high or low ETCO2 measurements 
can be resulted by buffer agents (i.e. NaHCO3), recent ingestion of 
carbonated beverages, antacids, a-agonists (i.e. epinephrine) and mask 
ventilation with CO2 containing gases such as nitrous oxide (Benumof, 1998; 
Sanders, 1989; Santos et al., 1993; Trillo et al., 1994).
An alternative to capnometer is a disposable ETCO2 detector, a colorimetric 
chemical indicator (Santos et al., 1993). This is a qualitative measurement 
of ETCO2 that changes color in the presence of CO2 (i.e. purple to yellow 
with presence of CO2). This paper will only address studies, which utilized 
capnometers to measure ETCO2 during CPR in ED and prehospital setting.
Research Critique: Experimental Studies
Before 1990, numerous experimental animal studies attempted to identify the 
relationship between ETCO2 and CO. An early experimental study by Sanders 
et al.(1985) attempted to determine if ETCO2 measurement during CPR could 
be used as a prognostic indicator of successful resuscitation from cardiac 
arrest in animal model. Using the time series design, the researchers 
measured ETCO2 during different phases of resuscitation (Wilson, 1989). 
This experimental study has qualities of manipulation, control and 
randomization (Polit & Hungler, 1995). Twelve healthy mongrel dogs (mean 
weight 11.3 ± 1.9 kg) were anesthetized with pentobarbital and 
endotracheally intubated. A capnometer was attached to the endotracheal 
tube (ETT) to record ETCO2 with each respiration. Catheters were inserted 
through femoral arteries and veins to reach the heart. Postmortem 
examination confirmed catheter placement. After the dogs were electrically 
fibrillated with 50 Hz through the pacing catheter, chest compressions and 
assisted ventilation (5:1 compression/ ventilation ratio) were started 
using the mechanical resuscitator. Half of the dogs received high pressure 
chest compressions (80 lb.) and half received low pressure compressions (40 
lb.). Epinephrine 0.5 mg was given at 3, 6, 9, and 12 minutes (min) of 
ventricular fibrillation (VF). After 15 min of chest compressions and 
assisted ventilation, animals were defibrillated with 80J. Data on ETCO2, 
aortic pressure, right atrial pressure, and ECG were recorded. The process 
for calibration for all these instruments was not found in the article. The 
mean and standard deviation of ETCO2 and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) 
at each minute of VF were calculated for resuscitated and nonresuscitated. 
For the remainder of this paper, the word return of spontaneous circulation 
(ROSC) will be used in describing resuscitated subjects.
For statistical analysis, two-tailed Student t test was used to detect the 
significant difference (P<.05) between ETCO2 of animals with ROSC and 
without ROSC at each minute of VF. According to Wilson (1989), t test for 
continuous variables is appropriated selection for this experimental study. 
There was a significant difference between ROSC and without ROSC animals in 
the overall mean ETCO2 (9.6 ± 3.2 mmHg vs. 3.2 ± 1.1 mmHg). Linear 
regression analysis was done to determine the relationship of ETCO2 to CPP 
during CPR. ETCO2 was highly correlated with CPP (r=.91; P<.01). Thus, it 
was concluded that CPP could be predicted from ETCO2 measured in this 
sample. This study used healthy dogs in which VF was induced artificially. 
Therefore, the applicability of these findings to the resuscitation of 
patients with cardiac and pulmonary diseases is questionable. Also, 
thoracic cavity is different in dogs; thus, chest compressions may produce 
different results. Future clinical studies are required for validation of 
these findings. Lacking routine measurements of arterial blood pressure and 
tidal volumes as part of the procedure evidenced some of the limitations of 
this study. It is possible that differences in these parameters may have 
influenced ETCO2. However, the measurements were not analyzed by the study; 
thus, the potential relationship is unknown.
Gudipati et al. (1988) also conducted an experimental time series study to 
investigate the potential usefulness of ETCO2 as a prognosticator of 
resuscitability. Minnesota mini pigs (N=22; weight 20-35 kg) were 
anesthetized with ketamine, pentobarbital sodium and pancuronium, a 
blocking agent. The pigs were intubated and mechanically ventilated with a 
set rate, tidal volume and mix flow rate. Femoral arteries and veins were 
used to insert pressure monitoring catheters to reach the heart. All 
instruments and procedures were thoroughly described in the article, but 
the description of ETCO2 analyzer calibration was not found in the article. 
For the ETCO2 measurement, a sidestream analyzer was attached to the ETT. 
CO was measured by the thermodilution technique. Before initiating CPR for 
cardiac arrest of ventricular fibrillation (VF), CO, ETCO2, aortic and 
right atrial pressures were monitored with pulmonary arterial and aortic 
blood gases. A current of 5 mA was delivered to the right ventricle to 
induce VF. Cardiac arrest was confirmed by VF on ECG with a decline in 
aortic systolic pressure to less than 25 mm Hg and decline in pulse 
pressure to less than 5 mmHg. At that time, the FIO2 was increased to 100% 
to maintain PaCO2 of 35-45 mmHg. The ventilator and compressor delivered 
5:1 compression/ventilation ratio. Thumper, a programmable cardiopulmonary 
resuscitator, delivered a set rate of compression with equal interval and 
depth at a regular cycle. At 1, 5, and 9 min during CPR, CO and ETCO2 
measurements were obtained. After 12 min of CPR, countershocks (40, 80, 160 
and 320 J) were applied to the anterior chest with a defibrillator. If 
animals were successfully resuscitated, CO measurements were repeated at 6 
min after resuscitation.
The second part of the experiment consisted of laparotomy (N=5), creating a 
window with a midline incision on pigs, who received same anesthesia, mode 
of ventilation and chest compressions. After 1 min of VF, direct cardiac 
massage was performed through the window for 5 min. Then, defibrillation 
with unknown amount of direct-current countershock was attempted. During 
this procedure, ETCO2 was continuously monitored and cardiac index (CI) was 
measured at 1 and 5 min after the initiation of direct cardiac massage. For 
statistical analysis, the difference in CI and ETCO2 between animals with 
ROSC and without ROSC were analyzed by the Student t test for unpaired 
measurements. This test was appropriate for testing the difference between 
the means of two independent groups (i.e. ROSC vs. without ROSC) (Norman & 
Streiner, 1997). The measurements of ETCO2 in ROSC and without ROSC animals 
were analyzed by repeated measurement analysis of variance by Wilk’s 
method. According to Polit and Hungler (1995), this test is used when there 
are three or more measures of the same dependent variable for each subject. 
For example, this type of test is used when multiple measures of the same 
dependent variables are collected longitudinally at several points in time 
(Polit & Hungler, 1995). With linear regression analysis, the correlation 
between ETCO2 and CI was analyzed as one independent variable (CI) was used 
to predict the dependent variable (ETCO2) (Polit & Hungler, 1995). The 
results showed a rapid increase in ETCO2 after ROSC. At 1 and 9 min after 
precordial compressions, the CI averaged 27 ± 1% and 38 ± 4% of prearrest 
values, respectively; ETCO2 averaged 27 ± 5% and 43 ± 8% of precardiac 
arrest value. After 6 min of spontaneous circulation, CO increased to 88 ± 
5% and ETCO2 increased to 121 ± 80% of precardiac arrest value. There was a 
significant difference in the average ETCO2 of the animals with ROSC and 
without ROSC (N=7 with ROSC, 1.7 ± 0.2%; N=5 without ROSC, 0.5 ± 0.1% , 
P<.001). The correlation between ETCO2 and CO for 22 animals averaged .92 ± 
.07 (ranged from .75 to .99; p<.001).
For open chest cardiac massage of 5 animals, ETCO2 and CI were measured 
before cardiac arrest, 1 and 5 min after beginning direct cardiac massage, 
and after ROSC. The researchers also reported similar proportional changes 
in ETCO2 and CI in the open chest animals. The correlation coefficients 
from the relationship between ETCO2 and CI for 5 animals ranged from .91 to 
.98 (mean .95 ± .014). This study showed that ETCO2 could be a noninvasive 
measure of pulmonary blood flow reflecting CO. Furthermore, ETCO2 was shown 
to identify ROSC and helped predict outcomes during CPR. Additionally, the 
dramatic increase in ETCO2 to a level exceeding the prearrest values 
provided a definite evidence of ROSC, suggesting that precordial 
compressions might not need to be interrupted to assess for ROSC. The 
findings in this study are promising but the generalizability to humans is 
speculative, requiring clinical trials to confirm its implication in 
clinical settings.
Research Critique: In-Hospital Studies (ED)
In the late 1980’s, several clinical studies were conducted in an attempt 
to confirm some of the findings from the experimental studies. The study by 
Garnett et al. (1987) was one of the first prospective quasi-experimental 
time series studies to determine the usefulness of ETCO2 in hemodynamic 
monitoring during CPR. The prospective time series design was an 
appropriate selection, allowing the researchers to use "before" 
measurements to establish a baseline while comparing posttreatment 
measurements (Wilson, 1989). According to Polit and Hungler (1995), 
quasi-experimental design does not contain a control group lacking 
randomization but has some manipulation of the procedure. In fact, 
strengths of this design are practicality, feasibility and generalizability 
(Polit & Hungler, 1995). Overall, the study design selection was 
appropriate. The inclusion criteria for the convenience sample were orally 
intubated adults (age ³ 18 years) with atraumatic prehospital cardiac 
arrest. The prehospital treatment consisted of basic and ACLS according to 
AHA. Upon ED arrival, CPR was continued using Thumper. A calibrated 
sidestream capnometer measured ETCO2 continuously. The article indicated 
that ETCO2 was reported as the percentage of CO2 in exhaled gas, but the 
normal value of CO2 was not stated in the article. The threat to the 
reliability and validity of the instrument was controlled by using a 
calibrated capnometer. ROSC was confirmed by the detection of pulse rate 
and audible or palpable blood pressure. Of twenty-three patients, whom had 
ETCO2 recorded during resuscitation, ten patients had ROSC. For data 
analysis, unpaired Student t-test appropriately compared the means of ETCO2 
in the two groups: the group with ROSC and without ROSC (Norman & Streiner, 
1997; Polit & Hungler, 1995). Paired Student t test compared two paired 
observations (ETCO2 values before ROSC and the peak ETCO2 after ROSC). P< 
0.05 was considered significant.
Before ROSC, ETCO2 measurements in the two groups were similar (with ROSC, 
N=10, 1.7 ± 0.6% vs. without ROSC, N=13, 1.8 ± 0.9%). In the ROSC group 
(N=10), ETCO2 increased so immediately that it was the very first clinical 
indicator of any changes in the patient’s status. The ETCO2 of the ROSC 
group peaked three times greater than before ROSC within 2-5 min (4.6 ± 
1.4%). Then, ETCO2 slowly declined to a stable level (3.1 ± 0.9%). 
Therefore, this study suggested that ETCO2 could be useful in predicting 
the positive outcome of CPR. The potential limitation of this study was 
that error could be introduced by the technological difficulties from 
Thumper or the method of mechanical ventilation. Although the sample size 
was small, the findings were generalizable to the ED settings, where ETCO2 
could be used to guide the treatment during resuscitation after atraumatic 
cardiac arrest.
Sanders et al.(1989) conducted the first clinical trial to determine if 
ETCO2 could be used as the prognostic indicator for ROSC. A convenience 
sample from two hospitals was included in this study. The inclusion 
criteria were the same as the previous study by Garnett et al. (1987). The 
exclusion criteria were described as traumatic cardiac arrest, invasive 
CPR, and ROSC after defibrillation without the need for intubation. 
Following intubation, a calibrated mainstream ETCO2 analyzer was placed 
between ETT and resuscitation bag. Manual ventilation presented a threat to 
the internal validity as hyperventilation could falsely decrease ETCO2 
(Callaham & Barton, 1990). ETCO2 measurements obtained five min after 
NaHCO3 administration were eliminated from the analysis due to the 
potential for a false increase in ETCO2 measurements. For data analysis, 
unpaired two tailed Student’s t test was used to compare the means of 
continuous variables (i.e. ETCO2). To determine the association of the 
nominal data (i.e. initial cardiac rhythm) with ROSC group, chi square 
analysis was used appropriately. Linear logistic regression is a procedure 
that analyzes the relationship between multiple independent variables (i.e. 
ETCO2 values at different time intervals) and the categorical dependent 
variable (ROSC vs. without ROSC) (Polit & Hunger, 1995). This test was 
appropriately used to evaluate the predictive effect of ETCO2 (independent 
variable) on patients with ROSC (yes/no-categorical dependent variables).
Of 133 eligible patients, only 35 patients were continuously monitored with 
capnometry and were eligible for analysis. Nine patients with ROSC had a 
mean ETCO2 of 15 ± 4 mmHg, which was greater than the mean ETCO2 for 26 
patients without ROSC (7 ± 5 mmHg). The mean ETCO2 of ROSC group at 11 to 
15 min was 17 ± 4 mmHg, whereas the mean ETCO2 for the group without ROSC 
was 9 ± 7 mmHg (P=.04). At 16 to 20 min, the difference between two groups 
further increased to 18 ± 6 mmHg vs. 6 ± 3 mmHg (P=.0004). All patients 
(N=9) with ROSC had the ETCO2 ³ 10 mmHg, but six patients without ROSC had 
ETCO2 of 10 mmHg. Sanders et al. (1989) explained that, despite adequate 
perfusion pressure for resuscitation, severe myocardial or coronary disease 
can prevent successful resuscitation. Therefore, one can conclude that 
ETCO2 greater than 10 mmHg do not guarantee a successful resuscitation. In 
fact, the threshold of 10 mmHg may not be generalizable for all patients, 
especially those with comorbidities. However, ETCO2 of 10 mmHg as a 
prognostic threshold value produced a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity 
of 77%, positive predictive value of 60% and negative predictive value of 
100% in this study. For the initial cardiac rhythm, VT/VF were associated 
with survival (P<.05) and asystole/EMD were associated with nonsurvival 
(P<.05). As pointed out by the authors, the generalizability could be 
limited by the potential inconsistency of instrumentation and collecting 
data on ETCO2 measurements in the two hospitals. Additionally, the chest 
compressions and ventilation were not quantified, which could effect ETCO2. 
The overall findings from the study by Sanders et al. (1989) concluded that 
ETCO2 could be used as a prognostic guide during CPR after atraumatic 
cardiac arrest.
Callaham and Barton (1990) also investigated the utility of ETCO2 as a 
predictive measure of initial outcome of resuscitation (i.e. ROSC) using 
the same study design and sample selection. The eligible patients (N=55) 
were atraumatic prehospital cardiac arrest victims, who were transported to 
the ED, where the study was conducted (age, 69.9 ± 12.2; N=35 male, 64%). 
The prehospital treatment included basic/advanced life support according to 
AHA. In the ED, patients were resuscitated by the most senior physicians, 
who were not aware of the possible significance of ETCO2 during this study 
period. Orally intubated patients were manually ventilated, which 
introduced a threat to the internal validity for lacking consistent control 
of the ventilation. Thumper delivered chest compressions (80/min with 50% 
compression cycle). Callaham and Barton (1990) used a calibrated mainstream 
capnometer for obtaining ETCO2. The main focus were the initial values of 
ETCO2, which were obtained both within five min of ED arrival and after one 
min of ventilation. The frequency of ‘regular interval’ monitoring and 
recording of ETCO2 were not defined in the article. For statistical 
analysis, unpaired two tailed Student’s t-test compared the initial ETCO2 
values of the two groups (with ROSC and without ROSC). Fourteen of 55 
patients had ROSC. The mean initial ETCO2 of ROSC group, whose ETCO2 
measurements were obtained both within five min of ED arrival and after one 
min of ventilation, was three times higher than the group without ROSC (19 
± 14 mmHg vs. 5 ± 4 mmHg, P<.0001). An initial ETCO2 of 15 mmHg correctly 
predicted ROSC with a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 98%, positive 
predictive value 91% and negative predictive value of 91%. The threshold of 
15 mmHg was deduced by plotting the ETCO2 values on the receiver operating 
curve. For the entry cardiac rhythm, there was a significant ROSC in 
patients presenting with asystole (P<.035) and EMD (P < .01) and compared 
to VF/VT. This finding was inconsistent with Sanders et al.(1989), who 
reported that asystole/EMD were associated with nonsurvival (P<.05). 
Callaham and Barton (1990) concluded that the initial predictive value of 
15 mmHg was not limited to a particular rhythm. A potential threat of 
Hawthorne effect (Polit & Hungler, 1995) could have caused the physicians 
to perform more aggressive resuscitation on patients in this study although 
the physicians were not aware of the significance of ETCO2. Furthermore, 
inadequately controlled manual ventilation could have potentially affected 
ETCO2. The generalizability of the findings from this study is limited to 
the ED population of atraumatic cardiac arrest without comorbidities such 
as COPD and ARDS. This study also demonstrated that a sudden rise of ETCO2 
often was the first indication of ROSC as seen in the studies from Garnett 
et al. (1987). Additionally, Callaham and Barton (1990) were able to deduce 
a predictive relationship between ETCO2 and the positive outcomes from CPR 
as did Sanders et al. (1989).
Steedman and Robertson (1990) in United Kingdom (UK) assessed the clinical 
applicability of ETCO2 measurement during CPR in the ED using the same 
study design and sample selection as the previously described studies. The 
major difference was that patients received only basic life support in the 
field. Upon arrival to the ED, the patients were orally intubated and 
ventilated with 100% oxygen. The calibrated mainstream capnometer monitored 
ETCO2 continuously and reported the values as the percentage of CO2 in 
exhaled gas. Steedman and Robertson (1990) controlled the potential threats 
to the internal validity by using a Thumper and mechanical ventilation. The 
paired t test was used to compare ETCO2 before and after ROSC. The unpaired 
t-test compared the means of ETCO2 in patients with and without ROSC.
Of the small sample size of 12 patients (age 69 ± 17; N=8 male), five 
patients had ROSC. In the ROSC group, ETCO2 gradually increased from 1.8 ± 
.92% to 3.38 ± 1.06% within one min (p < 0.05). ETCO2 reached its peak 
value (3.7 ± 1.08%) at two min. A stable level of ETCO2 (3.02 ± 0.52%) was 
maintained after a slight drop from the peak value at eight min or more of 
ROSC. Similar phenomenon was also reported by Garnett et al.(1987). ETCO2 
measurements were significantly different (P<0.001) between patients with 
and without ROSC (N=5, 2.63 ± 0.32%; N=7, 1.64 ± 0.89%, respectively). ROSC 
group in this study showed a two-fold increase in ETCO2. Four patients 
received a mean dose of 100 mEq NaHCO3 but did not show any statistical 
difference in ETCO2 (1.5 ± 0.49% to 1.8 ± .54%; P value was not available). 
One of the limitations of this study was that ACLS was not performed in 
prehospital, and the impact of this factor was not analyzed. The findings 
from this study confirmed the similar results from three previous studies, 
even though there was a small sample size. Therefore, the generalizability 
is evident. Steedman and Robertson (1990) concluded that ETCO2 monitoring 
could provide a useful noninvasive method to assess the effectiveness of 
blood flow produced by precordial compression after atraumatic cardiac arrest.
Research Critique: Prehospital Studies
Emergency medical service personnel rely on ECG rhythm, down time, time 
elapsed from CPR and the patient’s medical history as a prognosticator 
since there are no reliable data (Aspline & White, 1995). Aspline and White 
(1995) conducted a study to determine the prognostic significance of 
initial ETCO2 measurement and to explore the role of capnography in the 
management and outcome of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The 
purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that initial ETCO2 
measurements are higher in patient with ROSC during CPR and are therefore 
prognostic for ROSC in patients with OHCA. This was a prospective time 
series design looking at a convenience sample (N=34) of atraumatic OHCA 
over 13 months. According to the ACLS guidelines, the cardiac arrest 
victims were intubated endotracheally and continuously monitored with a 
mainstream analyzer. The ETCO2 analyzer was calibrated according to the 
manufacturer’s guideline. Automated ventilation, which was oxygen powered 
and time cycled, was used to maintain ventilation (10-12 per min with tidal 
volume of 600-800 ml). Since this was not a blinded study, having the 
automated ventilation was a good control for the internal validity. Without 
this control, the participants might aggressively bag the first 1-2 min to 
achieve a high initial ETCO2. The initial ETCO2 was recorded after 1-2 min 
of monitoring, and the maximum ETCO2 was recorded. Due to the potential 
effect of NaHCO3 on ETCO2, no ETCO2 within 5 min of NaHCO3 administration 
was documented for the analysis. This also was a good control for the 
threat to internal validity. For data analysis, one-tailed t test was used 
to compare the initial and maximum ETCO2 between the two groups (with ROSC 
and without ROSC). P £ .05 was considered significant. The one tailed test 
was appropriate since the hypothesis was testing the higher value of ETCO2.
ETCO2 measurements were documented only on 34 patients out of 65 patients. 
The potential problem related to the attrition was not addressed in the 
article. Of 34 patients, seven patients had ROSC before capnometry 
monitoring was started; thus, ETCO2 was not measured. The final 27 patients 
had ETCO2 readings available during CPR. After 1 min, ETCO2 in 14 patients 
with ROSC was significantly higher than patients without ROSC (23.0 ± 7.4 
mmHg vs. 13.2 ± 14.7 mmHg, P=.0002) as seen in the study by Callaham and 
Barton (1990). During CPR, the maximum value was higher in patients with 
ROSC than patients without ROSC (30.8 ± 9.5 mmHg vs. 22.7 ± 8.8 mmHg, 
P=.0154). Only three patients were survived to hospital discharge, but 
their neurological status was not described in the article. The usefulness 
of ETCO2 monitoring as a prognosticator for ROSC was promising but 
questionable, due to the small convenience sample size and small survival 
patients. Therefore, a larger sample is recommended.
Wayne et al.(1995) conducted a study to evaluate the quantitative 
measurement of ETCO2 in prehospital setting and to determine whether this 
value could be used as a marker to predict death. This study was a 
prospective time series design looking at patients (N=90, 61 males; age 
67.6 ± 13.6), who were victims of normothermic and atraumatic pulseless 
electrical activity (PEA). The reason for selecting PEA as an inclusion 
criterion was not described in the article. The exclusion criteria were 
having VF or VT. All samples were intubated and connected to a 
self-calibrated mainstream ETCO2 analyzer and ventilated by a standard 
adult bag valve mask. Using manual ventilation introduced a threat to the 
internal validity. The termination of resuscitation was based on the 
presence of persistent ETCO2 level of 10 mmHg or less after 20 minutes of 
ACLS. The researchers explained that an ETCO2 level of 10 mmHg represented 
less than 1% of CO2 production and was thus incompatible with life. But in 
reality, due to potential survival, the resuscitation went on until loss of 
electrical activity or ROSC, resulting in prolonged effort of CPR. For the 
analysis, Wilcoxin rank sum test was used for ordinal data. This test 
involves taking the difference between paired scores and ranking the 
absolute difference (Polit & Hungler, 1995). It is a nonparametric 
equivalent of the paired t test to compare group mean (i.e. initial, 
minimum ETCO2). The logistic regression was appropriately used to see the 
association between ETCO2 and survival to hospital discharge.
Seven out of 16 patients, who had ROSC, were discharged from the hospital. 
Four of the seven patients were neurologically intact; three had some 
neurologic impairment but were able to care for themselves. According to 
the results, the initial ETCO2 for the patients without ROSC was 11.7 ± 6.6 
mmHg vs. 10.9 ± 4.9 mmHg with ROSC. After 20 min of ACLS, the average ETCO2 
in the group without ROSC was 3.9 ± 2.8 mmHg and 31 ± 5.3 mmHg with ROSC 
(P<.0001). In 13 patients, the rise in ETCO2 was the first indication of 
ROSC before palpable pulse or blood pressure. Following this analysis, 
Wayne et al. (1995) hypothesized that the ETCO2 measurement £ 10 mmHg was a 
predictive value for death in the field. The study reported that no 
patients survived with ETCO2 less than 10 mmHg. At 20 min of ACLS, this 
threshold value of ETCO2 was accurate in predicting death in patients with 
atraumatic PEA. However, ETCO2 did not discriminate between the long term 
survivors and those who were deceased in hospital. The limitation of this 
study was that it contained a small sample size for prospective study. 
Further study with a large sample in different population would be 
required. Secondly, epinephrine did not effect the study results although 
other studies reported its decreasing effect on ETCO2. Thirdly, there was a 
potential for threat to the validity due to an interpreter variability in 
maintaining consistent minute ventilation using a bag valve device. Future 
studies confirming the accuracy of ETCO2 monitoring as a prognosticator of 
death or survival can help prevent futile efforts of CPR in the field.
Cantineau et al. (1996) conducted a prospective time series study to test 
the hypothesis that continuous assessment of ETCO2 during prehospital CPR 
allowed distinction between patients with ROSC and without ROSC with a 
sensitivity greater than 90%. A convenience sample (N=120: 84 males and 36 
females) with atraumatic prehospital arrest were included in the study. 
Fire fighters started resuscitation with bag-valve-mask ventilations and 
supplemental oxygen and chest compressions according to AHA. An 
anesthesiologist placed an ETT in all patients and continued mechanical 
ventilation with a set rate and tidal volume. The mechanism of chest 
compressions was not described in the article. The pharmacological 
interventions were given according to ACLS guidelines. Epinephrine was 
given to all patients. NaHCO3 was given for CPR greater than 10-15 min. 
Lidocaine and direct shock were administered for patients with VF. ROSC was 
defined as sustained blood pressure for at least 30 seconds. There were two 
parts to the study. The first part of the study determined a threshold 
value of ETCO2 that would be tested on a large scale. Twenty four patients 
had the ETCO2 measured with a sidestream analyzer. The ETCO2 analyzer 
calibration was not described in the article. There were three categories 
of ETCO2 for data collection and analysis: an initial ETCO2 measurement 
after 1 min of mechanical ventilation, minimum ETCO2 and maximum ETCO2 
measurements after the first 20 min after intubation and before ROSC. The 
sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each category. With NaHCO3, 
the ETCO2 measurements just before and 5 min after medication 
administration were included for the analysis. The second part of the study 
prospectively evaluated the maximum ETCO2 of 10 mmHg on 96 patients in a 
quasi-experimental design. Unlike the first part of the study, ETCO2 was 
measured by a mainstream analyzer. The reason for changing the technique to 
analyze ETCO2 was not described in the article. Having two different 
instruments was a threat to the external validity. For statistical 
analysis, unpaired student t-test was appropriately used for continuous 
data comparison of the independent group (cutoff ETCO2). Chi square for 
analyzing the categorical variables was an appropriate method to classify 
whether the ETCO2 measurement was below or above categorical groups of 
minimum and maximum groups. Student t-test (paired) appropriately analyzed 
the difference between the means of the two related groups (i.e. comparing 
ETCO2 before and after ROSC, ETCO2 before and after NaHCO3).
For the first part of the study, eight of the 24 patients had ROSC. The 
mean ETCO2 measurements were not significantly different in the ROSC or 
without ROSC group (16 ± 6.2 mmHg vs. 10.6 ± 8.4 mmHg; P=.12). ROSC was 
related to the significant increase in ETCO2 from 26.4 ± 5.4 mmHg to 48.7 ± 
13.8 mmHg (P<.01). In the second part of the study, thirty patients out of 
96 patients had ROSC. The maximum ETCO2 greater than 10 mmHg predicted ROSC 
with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 66% after 20 min of 
intubation. The maximum ETCO2 less than 10 mmHg was never associated with 
ROSC despite 40 min of resuscitation after intubation. Since this study 
contained a large number of patients with asystole compared to patients 
with VF/PEA, the generalizability of the findings is limited (asystole: 
N=109 vs. VF/PEA: N=11). However, this study confirmed the critical 
application of ETCO2 monitoring during resuscitation, which could be used 
to assess the prognosis of prolonged CPR in the prehospital setting as well 
as in the ED.
Critical and Original Analysis of Literature
The overall goal of the previously discussed studies was to determine the 
relationship of ETCO2 with CO and to evaluate ETCO2 as a prognosticator of 
CPR. In experimental studies, ETCO2 was shown to correlate well with CO, 
CPP and resuscitation outcome (Gudipati et al., 1988; Sanders et al., 
1985). As immediate indicator of successful resuscitation in animal models, 
this optimistic quality of ETCO2 served as a basis for human application 
during atraumatic cardiac arrest.
Applying the significant findings derived from experimental studies, the 
usefulness of ETCO2 monitoring and the predictive value of ETCO2 were later 
evaluated in clinical settings (Callaham & Barton, 1990; Garnett et al., 
1987; Steedman & Robertson, 1990). The same study design and sample 
selection were used in these studies. Common limitations to these studies 
were evidenced by using small sample size for the prospective design and 
inconsistent method of resuscitation. Garnett et al. (1987) and Steedman 
and Robertson (1990) used Thumper and mechanical ventilator, whereas 
Sanders et al. (1989) applied manual ventilation and failed to quantify and 
indicate the method of chest compression. Callaham and Barton (1990) used 
Thumper, but ventilation was not controlled mechanically. Sanders et al. 
(1989) and Callaham and Barton (1990) deduced threshold values for 
predicting a positive outcome from resuscitation (10 mmHg and 15 mmHg, 
respectively). Although Garnett et al. (1987) did not find any prognostic 
value for ROSC, the importance of ETCO2 for monitoring blood flow and 
guiding the treatment of CPR was confirmed as seen in the studies by 
Garnett et al.(1987) and Steedman and Robertson (1990). Callaham and Barton 
(1990) explained that the reason why Garnett et al. (1987) did not achieve 
the prognostic relationship of ETCO2 was related to using the sidestream 
technique. The sidestream technique is less accurate method of sampling 
CO2, and the measurement is depended on the location of sampling tube and 
the amount of supplemental oxygen (Callaham & Barton, 1990; LaValle & 
Perry, 1995).
The prehospital studies also showed the prognostic value of ETCO2 during 
CPR and observed similar findings (Aspline & White, 1995; Cantineau et al., 
1996; Wayne et al., 1995). The methods of resuscitation involving 
ventilation and compressions varied in each study. Aspline and White (1995) 
concluded that the initial ETCO2 could be a prognosticator for ROSC when 
automated ventilation was used during CPR. Despite the small sample size, 
these findings were similar to the findings from Callaham and Barton 
(1990). Similarly, Wayne et al. (1995) deduced a threshold value of less 
than 10 mmHg as the prognosticator for irreversible death in OHCA. However, 
the generalizability of this finding was limited due to the inclusion 
criterion of OHCA with PEA. With a larger sample size (N=120), Cantineau et 
al. (1996) conducted a two-part study in establishing that the maximum 
ETCO2 value of 10 mmHg had a higher sensitivity (>90%) to predict ROSC in 
OHCA of asystole. The generalizability of this finding was limited to 
patients with asystole due to the small number of samples with VF/PEA in 
the study. Additional threat to the validity of ETCO2 was introduced by 
using different types of ETCO2 analyzer. Nonetheless, all three prehospital 
studies supported the findings from in-hospital studies, demonstrating the 
potential value of ETCO2 as a prognosticator and as a guiding tool for the 
effectiveness of CPR.
Integration and Synthesis
Achieving the threshold value for prognostic determination was the most 
challenging and difficult accomplishment for all the studies discussed. 
Sanders et al. (1989) reported a mean ETCO2 of 15 mmHg for patients with 
ROSC and a mean of 7 mmHg for patients without ROSC. The threshold of 10 
mmHg predicted successful resuscitation with a sensitivity 100% and a 
specificity of 77%. Similarly, Callaham and Barton (1990) reported a mean 
of 19 mmHg for patients with ROSC. Their threshold of 15 mmHg predicted 
ROSC with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 98%.
In the prehospital studies, the overall mean value of ETCO2 for ROSC was 
higher than the mean value found by the in-hospital studies. For example, 
Aspline and White (1995) reported a mean of 23 mmHg for ROSC after 1 min of 
resuscitation and 13.2 mmHg without ROSC. Cantineau et al. (1996) reported 
a mean value of 24 mmHg for ROSC and a mean value of 13.8 mmHg without 
ROSC. The higher values of ETCO2 from prehospital studies may suggest that 
the early use of capnography during OHCA reflects differences in the timing 
and the physiologic state of cardiac arrest (Asplin & White, 1995). Since 
the timing of ETCO2 measurement after cardiac arrest may be a critical 
factor, establishing a prognostic value may be difficult, especially when 
the optimal time for ETCO2 measurement is unknown (Aspline and White, 
1995). Finding the threshold value can potentially minimize the cost and 
futile effort for prolonged CPR.
Although ETCO2 monitoring during CPR has a potential ability to predict the 
outcomes of CPR, there are several limitations. First, ETCO2 measurements 
may be effected by inconsistent methods of manual ventilation and chest 
compressions (Steedman & Robertson, 1990). In real life, manual ventilation 
and chest compressions could cause ETCO2 to fluctuate with the effort of 
compression and rate of ventilation (Sanders et al., 1989; Steedman & 
Robertson, 1990). Ideally, the minute ventilation should be controlled 
during quantitative monitoring of ETCO2 in cardiac arrest since ETCO2 is 
effected by the alveolar ventilation (Idris et al., 1994).
Second, the effect of the resuscitation medications such as NaHCO3 and 
epinephrine should be taken into consideration. According to Callaham, 
Barton and Matthay (1992), ETCO2 could be decreased inconsistently with 
epinephrine, but the predictive value of ETCO2 was not eliminated during 
CPR. The exact mechanism of decreasing ETCO2 after epinephrine 
administration is unknown (Callaham et al., 1992). The effect of higher 
dose of epinephrine remains questionable and requires further study. 
Concerning the effect of NaHCO3 on ETCO2, this medication has proven no 
benefits in cardiac arrest and should be avoided especially when monitoring 
ETCO2 (Callaham, 1990; Callaham et al., 1992). NaHCO3 is known as a buffer 
agent, which can transiently increase ETCO2 but the measurements return to 
perfusion level within 5 min (Trillo et al., 1993).
Third, the studies reported conflicting findings of cardiac rhythms that 
were associated with ROSC. According to Sanders et al. (1989), the initial 
cardiac rhythms of VT/VF were associated with ROSC, and asystole/EMD were 
associated with nonsurvival (no ROSC). However, these findings were 
inconsistent from Callaham and Barton (1990), who reported that asystole 
/EMD were significantly associated with the outcome of ROSC. The analysis 
from prehospital studies did not support these findings. Wayne et al. 
(1995) only assessed patients with PEA and excluded VF/VT. The rational for 
the exclusion criterion was not found in the article. In addition, the 
findings from the study by Cantineau et al. (1996) were applicable to 
patients with atraumatic cardiac arrest of asystole.
Lastly, atraumatic cardiac arrests can be frequently caused by acute and 
chronic illness with comorbidities. As discussed previously, when 
ventilation and perfusion are equal, PaCO2 is equivalent to ETCO2 (LaValle 
& Perry, 1995). However, conditions such as COPD or ARDS result in a VQ 
abnormality and high CO2 gradient, which causes PaCO2 to change and make it 
difficult to assess the accuracy of ETCO2 (LaValle & Perry, 1995; Levin & 
Pizov, 1997; Santos et al., 1993). The potential implication of ETCO2 
monitoring under these circumstances including traumatic cardiac arrest is 
limited as evidenced by lack of studies looking at the different groups of 
patients.
Application
Currently, ETCO2 monitoring is widely used for various clinical practices 
such as verification of endotracheal tube placement, assessment of 
conscious sedation safety and evaluation of mechanical ventilation (LaValle 
& Perry, 1995; Sanders, 1989; Santos et al., 1993). ETCO2 monitoring can 
guide nurses in providing adequate oxygenation and ventilation to unstable 
patients if capnography is used correctly (LaValle & Perry, 1995). For 
example, ETCO2 monitoring in conjunction with ABG’s are useful for ensuring 
adequate ventilation for patients with head injuries (Sanders, 1989). A 
fall in ETCO2 may mean decrease in lung perfusion. If ventilation has not 
changed, the decrease in ETCO2 may indicate early signs of shock (Sanders, 
1989). However, ETCO2 must be interpreted in the context of other 
information about the patient’s clinical status.
In the ED, the application of ETCO2 monitoring contributes an additional 
valuable asset to the clinical practice, especially during resuscitation. 
One can use the feedback from ETCO2 to change the effort (depth/rate/force) 
of chest compression during CPR (Lambert et al., 1992). Due to the ability 
of ETCO2 to detect ROSC, CPR does not need to be interrupted in order to 
establish whether spontaneous circulation has been restored (Steedman & 
Robertson, 1990). The use of ETCO2 monitoring in OHCA can potentially 
increase the rate of ROSC and survival by instituting earlier monitoring 
that could guide the effectiveness of CPR (Aspline & White, 1995).
In conclusion, the critical role of ETCO2 monitoring during CPR has been 
demonstrated and confirmed by both experimental and clinical studies. An 
ETCO2 analyzer is easy to apply and readily available. As a quantitative 
indicator of the volume of blood flow produced by pericardial compressions, 
ETCO2 can be a noninvasive method of monitoring the efficacy of ongoing 
effort and the outcome of CPR (Falk et al., 1988; LaValle & Perry, 1995; 
Sanders et al., 1989).

References
Asplin, B. R., & White, R. D. (1995). Prognostic value of end-tidal carbon 
dioxide pressures during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Annals of 
Emergency Medicine, 25(6), 756-761.
Hollinger, C. B., & Hoyt, J. W. (1995). Capnography and respiratory 
monitoring. In Ayres, S. M., Grenvik, A., Holbrook, P. R., & Shoemaker W. 
C. (Eds.), Textbook of Critical Care (pp. 305-310). Philadelphia: W. B. 
Saunders.
Benumof, J. L. (1998). Interpretation of capnography. Journal of the 
American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, 66(2), 169-176.
Bonnin, M. J., Pepe, P. E., Kimbal, K. T., & Clark, P. S. Jr. (1993). 
Distinct criteria for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital 
setting. Journal of American Medical Association, 270(12), 1457-1462.
Cantineau, J. P., Lambert, Y., Merckx, P., Reynaud, P., Porte, F., 
Bertrand, C., & Duvaldestine, P. (1996). End-tidal carbon dioxide during 
cardiopulmonary resuscitation in humans presenting mostly with asystole: A 
predictor of outcome. Critical Care Medicine, 24(5), 791-796.
Callaham, M. (1990). High dose epinephrine and other advances in management 
of cardiac arrest. Western Journal of Medicine, 152(6),697-703.
Callaham, M. & Barton, C. (1990). Prediction of outcome of cardiopulmonary 
resuscitation from end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration. Critical Care 
Medicine, 18(4), 358-362.
Callaham, M., Barton, C., & Matthay, M. (1992). Effect of epinephrine on 
the ability of end-tidal carbon dioxide readings to predict initial 
resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Critical Care Medicine, 20 (3), 337-343
Domsky, M., Wilson, R. F., & Heins, J. (1995). Intraoperative end-tidal 
carbon dioxide values and derived calculations correlated with outcome: 
Prognosis and capnography. Critical Care Medicine, 23(9), 1497-1503.
Falk, J. L., Rackow, E. C., & Weil, M. H. (1988). End-tidal carbon dioxide 
concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The New England Journal 
of Medicine, 318 (10), 607-611.
Garnett, A. R., Ornato, J. P., Gonzalez, E. R., & Johnson, B. (1987). 
End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 
Journal of American Medicine Association, 257(4), 512-515.
Gray, W. A., Capone, R. J., Most, A. S. (1991). Unsuccessful medical 
resuscitation: Are continued efforts in the emergency department justified? 
New England Journal of Medicine, 325(20), 1393-1398.
Gudipati, C. V., Weil, M. H., Bisera, J., Deshmukh, H. G., & Rackow, E. C. 
(1988). Expired carbon dioxide: a noninvasive monitor of cardiopulmonary 
resuscitation. Circulation, 77(1), 234-239.
Higgins, D., Hayes, M., Denman, W., & Wilkinson, D. J. (1990). 
Effectiveness of using end tidal carbon dioxide concentration to monitor 
cardiopulmonary resuscitation. British Medical Journal, 300(6724), 581.
Idris, A. H., Staples, E. D., O’Brien, D. J., Melker, R. J., Rush, W. J., 
Del Duca, K. D., & Falk, J. L. (1994). End-tidal carbon dioxide during 
extremely low cardiac output. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 23(3), 568-572.
Kalenda, Z. (1978). The capnogram as a guide to the efficacy of cardiac 
massage. Resuscitation, 6, 259-263.
Lambert, Y., Cantineau, J. P. Merckx, P., Bertrand, C., & Duvaldestin, P. 
(1992). Influence of end-tidal CO2 monitoring on cardiopulmonary 
resuscitation. Anesthesiology, 77(3A), A1081.
LaValle, T. L., & Perry, A. G. (1995). Capnography: Assessing end-tidal CO2 
levels. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 14(2), 70-77.
Levin, P. D. & Pizov, R. (1997). End-tidal carbon dioxide and outcome of 
out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (Letter). The New England Journal of 
Medicine, 337(23), 1694-1695.
Levine, R. L., Wayne, M. A., & Miller, C. C. (1997). End-tidal carbon 
dioxide and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The New-England 
Journal of Medicine, 337(5), 301-306.
Nielsen, M. S. Fitchet, A., & Sanders, D. A. (1990). Monitoring 
cardiopulmonary resuscitation by end tidal carbon dioxide concentration. 
British Medical Journal, 300(6730), 1012-1013.
Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1997). PDQ Statistics (2nd ed.). St. 
Louis: Mosby.
Ornato, J. P., Garnett, A. R., & Glauser, F. L. (1990). Relationship 
between cardiac output and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension. Annals of 
Emergency Medicine, 19(10), 1104-1106.
Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and 
methods (5th ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Sanders, A. B., Ewy, G. A., Bragg, S., Atlas, M., & Kern, K. B. (1985). 
Expired PCO2 as a prognostic indicator of successful resuscitation from 
cardiac arrest. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 14(10), 948-952
Sanders, A. B. (1989). Capnometry in Emergency Medicine. Annals of 
Emergency Medicine, 18(12), 1287-1290.
Sanders, A. B., Kern, K. B., Otto, C. W., Milander, M. M., & Ewy, G. 
A.(1989). End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary 
resuscitation: A prognostic indicator for survival. Journal of American 
Medicine Association, 262(10), 1347-1351.
Santos, L. J., Varon, J., Pic-Aluas, L., & Combs, A. H. (1993). Practical 
uses of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in the emergency department. 
The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12(5), 633-644.
Steedman, D. J. & Robertson, C. E. (1990). Measurement of end-tidal carbon 
dioxide concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Archives of 
Emergency Medicine, 7, 129-134.
Trillo, G., von Planta, M., & Kette, F. (1994). ETCO2 monitoring during low 
flow states: clinical aims and limits. Resuscitation, 27, 1-8.
Wayne, M. A., Levine, R. L., & Miller, C. C. (1995). Use of end-tidal 
carbon dioxide to predict outcome in prehospital cardiac arrest. Annals of 
Emergency Medicine, 25(6), 762-766.
Weil, H. M., Rackow, E. C., Trevino, R., Grundler, W., Falk, J. L., & 
Griffel, M. I. (1986). Difference in acid-base state between venous and 
arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The New England 
Journal of Medicine, 301(3), 153-156.
Wilson, H. S. (1989). Research in nursing (2nd ed). California, 
Addison-Wesley.

"End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring During CPR: A Predictor of Outcome"
by Jinhee Nguyen, RN MSN [[log in to unmask]]
© Jinhee Nguyen, RN MSN
is presented by Emergency Nursing World ! [http:ENW.org]
Tom Trimble, RN [[log in to unmask]] ENW Webmaster
ENW name, logos, and layout ©Tom Trimble, RN

  ------------------------------------------------------------
  Free Web Email & Filter Enhancements.
  http://www.freewebemail.com/filtertools/
  ------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager