[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Perhaps your note reveals a hint at where our disagreements and
> misunderstandings are. All of you examples are framed in terms of the
> "agent elements". In that case your argument makes some sense, e.g.,
> the string "The Beatles" is the "human readable name" of that group. My
> statements, however, are meant to apply to all DC elements. The methods
> being discussed regarding default value are intended to be general.
> Thus, the use of rdfs:label in the case of the subject element (picking
> one example) seems pretty far from "a human readable version of a
> resource name".
The subject would make sense too (as I've shown before). The literal for:
http://dir.yahoo.com/Computers/Internet/
would be "Internet". There are a few however that don't make sense, like
Identifier (where the appropriate literal would be the resource name itself)
for example and we've included those exceptions in the algorithm.
--
[ Aaron Swartz | [log in to unmask] | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
|