On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Matola,Tod wrote:
> Oops that section is not quite right (this is a DRAFT for discussion).
>
> We have the running assumption that the DCES namespace is fixed and not
> changeing. I motion we fix this section to reflect that assumption
I agree. A change here would cause a lot of trouble.
> http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title
>
> Sorry about the confusion. This is intended to be policy for future schema
> and the DCES namespace will remain as is.
>
> The next sticky point is how many people will be broken if we use
> dd/name instead of dd-name in the pattern (e.g.
> http://dublincore.org/yyyy/mm/dd/name)?
We have things based on dcq and dced in the pipe-line. But we could live
with a change from '2000/03/13-dcq' to '2000/03/13/dcq'. Expect that quite
a few use these already, though.
Now, please note that this DRAFT contains sections on the maintenance of
the namespaces. We need comments on those policies as well.
Sigge
|